0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Investigation of the American Petroleum Institute’s Support Stiffness Ratio Specification

[+] Author Affiliations
David J. Griffin, Roger L. Fittro, Robert D. Rockwell, Christopher P. Goyne

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Paper No. GT2017-63142, pp. V07BT33A002; 13 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2017-63142
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
  • Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, June 26–30, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5093-0
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

In the design phase of developing a rotating machine, it is important to consider the effect that the supporting structure has on the rotordynamic behavior of the system. The American Petroleum Institute’s (API) Standard Paragraphs state that if the support stiffness is greater than 3.5 times the bearing oil film stiffness, the designer may omit the supports from the rotordynamic analysis. As discussed in this paper, there is concern that machines operating near the second critical speed may not be adequately modeled using the rigid support assumption allowed by API. Due to the suspected influence of support dynamics on problem machines in industry, this paper investigates the effectiveness of the support to bearing stiffness ratio threshold of 3.5. A Jeffcott rotor model is used to capture the effect of the support on the separation margin and amplification factors of the first and second critical speeds. The trends are then validated using numerical models of two case studies. Results show that the API support stiffness ratio of 3.5 has limitations as a rigid support threshold and should be used with caution when the second critical speed is near a separation margin boundary. The paper proposes an addendum to the current API specification intended to reduce the risk of separation margin encroachment due to a rigid support assumption. Unlike other papers discussing the influence of flexible supports on rotating machinery, this investigation studies the effects at API’s support stiffness ratio of 3.5 and compares them to a rigid support system.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Petroleum , Stiffness

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In