Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Calibration of Stress Transfer Functions for Wellhead Fatigue

[+] Author Affiliations
Dara Williams

Wood Group Kenny, Galway, Ireland

Paper No. OMAE2015-41488, pp. V05BT04A019; 11 pages
  • ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 5B: Pipeline and Riser Technology
  • St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, May 31–June 5, 2015
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5652-9
  • Copyright © 2015 by ASME


In many harsh environment or high current regions (e.g. West of Shetlands, East Africa and GoM) wellhead fatigue during drilling or workover activities can be a major concern. As a result extensive wellhead and conductor fatigue assessments are required in order to predict likely fatigue damage prior to landing the BOP on to the wellhead. These pre-drilling or predictive studies are based on a number of assumptions regarding actual environmental and soil conditions. In addition the uncertainty associated with the input data requires safety factors of 10 and 20 for wave and VIV effects respectively. As a result of these assumptions the predicted levels of fatigue damage to the wellhead may be highly conservative. In cases where wellhead and conductor fatigue life is a concern the operator may choose to deploy motion monitoring systems on the BOP stack so that actual fatigue loads recorded during drilling can be calculated. These systems can be configured to provide ‘real-time’ updates on fatigue damage accumulation or can be used to record data for ‘post-drilling’ assessment. In each case the methodology applied to calculate stresses at fatigue hotspots is critical to the calculation of overall fatigue damage.

The calculation of fatigue loads based on measured data is typically carried out by applying the measured BOP motions to a global finite element model of the drilling riser and wellhead system. However due to the large amounts of data involved this can be a very time consuming exercise and is not conducive to ‘real-time’ presentation of results (e.g. for on-board systems). A proposed solution to this problem is to develop stress transfer functions (STFs) that relate BOP motion to stresses at critical fatigue hotspots. Thus ‘real-time’ BOP motions and be instantly converted to ‘real-time’ stresses. However, as is outlined in this paper, the frequency content of the system response can have a significant impact on the levels of stress calculated. If frequency dependent response is not accounted for a significant under-prediction in fatigue loads may occur.

The objective of this paper is to outline a detailed methodology to derive STFs for critical fatigue hotspots in the wellhead and conductor. This methodology accounts for capturing the non-linear frequency dependence of the system and incorporating this into the STFs. In addition a methodology for rapidly calculating ‘real-time’ fatigue damage accumulation in the wellhead and conductor system and presenting this data on-board is also outlined.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME



Interactive Graphics


Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In