0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Labyrinth Seal and Pocket Damper Seal High Pressure Rotordynamic Test Data

[+] Author Affiliations
Giuseppe Vannini, Stefano Cioncolini, Giuseppe Del Vescovo, Massimiliano Rovini

GE Oil&Gas, Florence, Italy

Paper No. GT2013-94099, pp. V07BT30A003; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2013-94099
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition
  • Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics
  • San Antonio, Texas, USA, June 3–7, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5527-0
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

The current centrifugal compressor design for the Oil & Gas market is more and more challenging, and the presence of many competitors is pushing technology towards both a casing size reduction and a rotational speed increase. The first point is leading to an increase in the number of wheels per rotor (to do the same service), and the second point is forcing to cross two or even three rotor modes (hence a higher control of rotor damping is necessary). The two points together are leading to increase the rotor “Flexibility Ratio” (defined as the ratio between the Maximum Continuous Speed and the first critical speed at infinite support stiffness according to [1]), and finally the rotordynamic stability is very much challenged.

The centrifugal compressors rotordynamic stability is strongly related to the internal seals’ dynamic behaviour, and for this reason, the authors’ company decided several years ago to develop internally a High Pressure Seal Test Rig [2] to measure internal seals stiffness and damping. The rig is now in operation, and in a previous paper the authors described its main capabilities, the applied identification procedures and the preliminary test results captured for a long Labyrinth seal (smooth rotor, straight toothed stator) tested up to 200bar.

This paper is intended to show more data for the same long Laby with special focus on some peculiar test as:

• Negative preswirl test

• Single frequency vs. Multi-frequency test

• Offset vs. Centered Seal test

The negative preswirl test shows a drastic change in the effective damping (from destabilizing to stabilizing) and provides a support in favor of the selection of swirl reversal devices at seals upstream.

The multi-frequency excitation test approach (based on the concurrent presence of several frequencies not multiples at each other) is compared with a single frequency excitation providing similar results and thus confirming the soundness of the multiple effects linear superimposition assumption.

The effect of a static offset (simulating the real position of a rotor inside an annular seal) is also investigated proving that the relevant impact is negligible within the range of eccentricity explored (10% of seal clearance).

Moreover, a Pocket Damper Seal (PDS) with the same nominal diameter, clearance and effective length has been tested (up to 300bar) and compared with the Laby. As expected, the PDS shows both a higher effective stiffness and damping at the same test conditions, so the promising results already collected in a previous test campaign which was performed on a smaller scale and lower pressure test rig [3] were mostly confirmed with the only exception for the effective damping cross-over frequency which was lower than expected.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In