0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

IMTHUA Methods for Thermal-Hydraulics Code Structure Uncertainty Assessment

[+] Author Affiliations
Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, Ali Mosleh, Mohammad Modarres

University of Maryland, College Park, MD

Paper No. ICONE16-48075, pp. 57-66; 10 pages
doi:10.1115/ICONE16-48075
From:
  • 16th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
  • Volume 3: Thermal Hydraulics; Instrumentation and Controls
  • Orlando, Florida, USA, May 11–15, 2008
  • Conference Sponsors: Nuclear Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-4816-7 | eISBN: 0-7918-3820-X
  • Copyright © 2008 by ASME

abstract

A successful treatment of model uncertainty results in an expression of uncertainty that includes the true value at some stated level of confidence. Code structure uncertainties (model uncertainty) are a crucial source of uncertainty quantification for thermal-hydraulics (TH) system codes such as RELAP5, TRAC, and recently consolidated TRACE code. These codes are an assembly of models and correlations for simulation of physical phenomena and behavior of system component. In some cases there are alternative sub-models, or several different correlations for calculation of a single phenomenon of interest. There are also “user options” for choosing one of several models or correlations in performing a specific code computation. Dynamic characteristics of TH add more complexity to the code calculation, meaning for example, that specific code models and correlations invoked are sequence-dependent, and based certain (dynamic) conditions being satisfied. This paper discusses the techniques developed in the Integrated Methodology for Thermal-Hydraulics Uncertainty Analysis (IMTHUA), specifically for the treatment of uncertainties due to code structure and models. The methodology comprehensively covers various aspects of complex code uncertainty assessments for important accident transients. It considers the TH code structural uncertainties explicitly by treating internal sub-model uncertainties, and by propagating such model uncertainties in the code calculations (including uncertainties about input parameters.) Structural uncertainty assessment (model uncertainty) for a single model will be discussed by considering “correction factor”, “bias”, and also through sub-model output updating with available experimental evidence. In case of multiple alternative models, techniques of dynamic model switching, user controlled model selection, model mixing, and model maximization/minimization will be discussed. Examples from different applications including, Marviken test facility blowdown, LOFT LBLOCA and a typical PWR LOCA scenario calculations will be provided for greater clarification of the proposed techniques.

Copyright © 2008 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In