0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Detailed Observation of Hydrofoil Cavitation and a Proposal for Improving Cavitation Model

[+] Author Affiliations
Motohiko Nohmi

Ebara Corporation, Futtsu, Chiba, Japan

Naoya Ochiai, Yuka Iga, Toshiaki Ikohagi

Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

Paper No. FEDSM-ICNMM2010-30435, pp. 19-27; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/FEDSM-ICNMM2010-30435
From:
  • ASME 2010 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting collocated with 8th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels
  • ASME 2010 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting: Volume 2, Fora
  • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, August 1–5, 2010
  • Conference Sponsors: Fluids Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4949-1 | eISBN: 978-0-7918-3880-8
  • Copyright © 2010 by ASME

abstract

Cavitation of a hydrofoil is observed in detail by using a high speed video camera. A paint removal test is also carried out in order to evaluate cavitation aggressiveness for erosion. 2D hydrofoil profile is Clark Y 11.7% and its angle of attack is seven degrees. Cavitation number is σ = 1.08. The experimental results are compared with cavitation CFD. Numerous features of unsteady cavitation are observed such as cyclic fluctuation of the sheet cavity, existence of the glassy cones on a sheet cavity, generation of the cloud cavitation from the sheet cavity and the isolated bubbles traveling over the suction surface of the blade. The isolated traveling bubbles and their collapses are thought to be one of the main causes of the severe paint removals. The isolated traveling bubbles are derived from the flowing cavitation nucleus or from abrupt onset at the leading edge of the blade. For computing these complicated phenomena, combination of grid scale bubbles (GSB) and sub grid scale bubble model (SGSB) are proposed. GSB shall be computed by using the computational scheme for the free surface with phase change model. SGSB can be computed with conventional cavitation model. The breakup of GSB generates SGSB, and the coalescence of SGSB makes GSB. Upper limit of void fraction of SGSB is estimated in the range of five or ten percent from the simple speculation of the structure of packed spheres. The two types of cavitation bubble inception model are also discussed based on the generation of the isolated bubbles observed in the experiments. To verify the proposed concepts of cavitation model, a traveling air bubble over a hydrofoil is computed by using the free surface flow scheme of Volume of Fluid (VOF) approach. Cavitation on the hydrofoil is also computed by VOF approach with boiling model concerning the heat transfer. Both the computed results show qualitatively similar characteristics of the bubble dynamics to those in experimental results.

Copyright © 2010 by ASME
Topics: Cavitation , Hydrofoil

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In