0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Information Overload: Processing Consultation Responses From Experts, Stakeholder Groups and Communities

[+] Author Affiliations
David Collier

Greenstreet Berman, Ltd.

Paula Orr

Environment Agency of England and Wales, Rotherham, UK

Paper No. ICEM2003-4579, pp. 1659-1666; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/ICEM2003-4579
From:
  • ASME 2003 9th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation
  • 9th ASME International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation: Volumes 1, 2, and 3
  • Oxford, England, September 21–25, 2003
  • Conference Sponsors: Nuclear Engineering Division and Environmental Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 0-7918-3732-7 | eISBN: 0-7918-3731-9
  • Copyright © 2003 by ASME

abstract

Contemporary approaches to the design and implementation of consultation programmes have come a long way from the days of ‘decide-announce-defend’. However success in expanding involvement and combining different participation methods, especially within a complex multi-phase programme, still poses major challenges. This paper discusses one of them: processing the much increased volume and variety of contributions received and then combining them with other forms of input in a rigorous, balanced, auditable and transparent manner. It is no longer sufficient, if indeed it every really was, for someone simply to work their way through a stack of comments with a highlighter, altering a draft text where he or she judged that clarification was required. We illustrate the nature of the challenge and the response of the Environment Agency of England and Wales by considering some specific issues, including the following. • Applicability of systematic approaches to text and transcript analysis; • Use of qualitative data management systems; • Transparency vs confidentiality; • Inconsistencies between stakeholder/public concerns and regulatory boundaries; • Integration of different types of input; • Deciding what to take into account; judging validity and weight; • Implications for quality management, documentation and resources; • Approaches to programme evaluation.

Copyright © 2003 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In