0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Application of an a priori Jacobian-Based Error Estimation Metric to the Accuracy Assessment of 3D Finite Element Simulations

[+] Author Affiliations
Robert B. Rainsberger

XYZ Scientific Applications, Inc., Pleasant Hill, CA

Jeffrey T. Fong

National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

Pedro V. Marcal

MPACT, Corp., Oak Park, CA

Paper No. PVP2018-84784, pp. V06BT06A076; 19 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2018-84784
From:
  • ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 6B: Materials and Fabrication
  • Prague, Czech Republic, July 15–20, 2018
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5168-5
  • Copyright © 2018 by ASME

abstract

The determinant of the Jacobian matrix is frequently used in the Finite Element Method as a measure of mesh quality.

A new metric is defined, called the Standard Error, based on the distribution of the determinants of the Jacobian matrices of all elements of a finite element mesh. Where the Jacobian norm can be used to compare the quality of one element to another of the same type, the Standard Error compares the mesh quality of different versions of a finite element model where each version uses a different element type.

To motivate this new Standard Error, we investigate the geometric meaning of the Jacobian norm on 3D Finite Elements. This mesh quality metric is applied to 8, 20, and 27 node hexahedra, 6 and 15 node prisms, 4 and 10 node tetrahedra, 5 and 13 node pyramid, and 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 node shell elements. The shape functions for these 14 element types, or more precisely their first partial derivatives, are used to construct the Jacobian Matrix. The matrix is normalized to compensate for size. The determinant of the Jacobian is calculated at Gaussian points within each element. Statistics are gathered to form the Standard Error of the mesh.

To illustrate the applicability of this a priori metric, we present two simple example problems having exact answers, and two industry-type problems, a pipe elbow with a crack and a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) birdcage RF coil resonance, both having no analytical solution.

Significance and limitations of using this a priori metric to assess the accuracy of finite element simulations of different mesh designs are presented and discussed.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In