0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Predicted Cyclic Creep Damage From a Multi-Material Weldment FEA Model and the Traditional R5 Volume 2/3 Weldment Approach

[+] Author Affiliations
Feras ElAgha, David Tanner, David Knowles

WS Atkins Ltd., Bristol, UK

Paper No. PVP2018-85120, pp. V03AT03A034; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2018-85120
From:
  • ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 3A: Design and Analysis
  • Prague, Czech Republic, July 15–20, 2018
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5162-3
  • Copyright © 2018 by ASME

abstract

The R5 assessment procedure for Integrity of High Temperature Structures employs a Weld Strain Enhancement Factor (WSEF) (dependent only upon classified weld type) for predicting creep-fatigue crack initiation at weldments (V2/3 Appendix 4). This serves to amplify the calculated total strain at the weld toe for full penetration welds to account for geometric concentration and material mismatch between weldment zones. The value of WSEF recommended for fillet welds was derived from a review of a limited number of tests on thin welds which were not wholly representative of a typical fillet weld.

The objective of this paper is to present a comparison of the predicted cyclic creep defect initiation damage at a fillet weld toe using a multi-material finite element (FE) model of the weldment, against the damage predicted using the traditional R5 V2/3 approach, which uses only the parent material properties to derive the weld toe strain range in combination with the WSEF. In this example, the fillet weld joins a high temperature tube to an anti-vibration strap. There is pressure loading in the tube and displacement loading due to thermal expansion.

The FE model incorporates material properties associated with both the parent and the weld metal, including elastic modulus, plastic yield properties, creep deformation, and creep ductility (to determine damage via ductility exhaustion). The finite element analysis is run for 30 cycles (pressure and thermal cycling) with an average dwell period of 736 hours, with predicted damages for 100 cycles estimated using extrapolation. Sensitivities considering the stress-strain properties of the weld are included.

The cycle to cycle evolution of damage after 100 cycles including the weld-parent interaction in the FE modelled weldment is shown to be significantly lower than that predicted by the traditional R5 V2/3 route.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In