0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Treatise on Weld Evaluation

[+] Author Affiliations
Dipak K. Chandiramani

Independent Consultant, Mumbai, India

Sadasivan Narayana

Materials Evaluation Services (M) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India

Paper No. PVP2018-84109, pp. V01BT01A005; 12 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2018-84109
From:
  • ASME 2018 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 1B: Codes and Standards
  • Prague, Czech Republic, July 15–20, 2018
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5159-3
  • Copyright © 2018 by ASME

abstract

Welds are inspected by various techniques which include visual examination, surface examination and volumetric examination.

While the above techniques would qualify a weld to workmanship criteria, they would not necessarily be indicative of weld properties.

Preparation and qualification of welding procedures and testing of production welds are indicative that the weldment would probably provide a safe and satisfactory service life.

However, weldments have to operate at their design conditions which may include high temperatures and ASME Codes do not necessarily stipulate tests for verification of high temperature properties. In addition, defective welds are often repaired by removing the originally deposited weld metal and re-welding. The effects of double heat input are not necessarily evaluated.

In this paper, an insight is provided into the factors which provide assurance that weldments will perform satisfactorily in service and the combination of non-destructive evaluation methods which would enable effective detection of imperfections.

Non-destructive volumetric examination method for welds has traditionally be radiography. With the advent of automated data acquisition methods in Ultrasonics, like Time of Flight Diffraction and Phased Array Ultrasonic Testing, these methods are rapidly replacing radiographic methods for weld inspection.

Ultrasonic acceptance criteria in ASME Section VIII Div. 1, ASME Section VIII Div. 2 and ASME Section IX do not include evaluation of porosity as ultrasonic methods do not easily detect porosity.

The result of all this is that today we are accepting welders qualified using Ultrasonic examination as per ASME Section IX but on the job there is still the option of inspecting the weld using Radiography in which, excessive porosity can be a cause for weld repair.

Considering this and various other criteria, a comprehensive weld evaluation methodology is proposed taking advantage of the strengths of each inspection technique while welding technology used would ensure that welds have required properties at service temperatures.

A proposal is also made to improve the detectability of imperfections using modifications of existing Ultrasonic A-scan Techniques.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In