0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Under Ballast Mat Performance With Different Support Conditions Through Laboratory Experiment and Numerical Simulation

[+] Author Affiliations
Yu Qian

University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC

Kaijun Zhu

Saiful Bouquet Structural Engineers Inc., Pasadena, CA

Arthur de Oliveira Lima, Marcus S. Dersch, J. Riley Edwards

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL

Paper No. JRC2018-6154, pp. V001T01A008; 5 pages
doi:10.1115/JRC2018-6154
From:
  • 2018 Joint Rail Conference
  • 2018 Joint Rail Conference
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, April 18–20, 2018
  • Conference Sponsors: Rail Transportation Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5097-8
  • Copyright © 2018 by ASME

abstract

Under-ballast mats (UBMs) have become more popular recently in railroad track engineering. Benefits of introducing an under-ballast mat layer(s) into the track include, but are not limited to: increasing track resilience, reducing ballast breakage, decreasing noise and vibration, and protecting bridge decks. One of the most essential parameters used to evaluate the performance of UBMs is the bedding modulus. Currently, the German Deutsches Institut für Normung (DIN) 45673 is the only test standard specifying procedures to quantify UBM bedding modulus by placing the UBM between two steel plates. However, steel plates might not be an ideal representation of the actual track loading environment. Thus, other types of support conditions have been used to test the UBM bedding modulus, including concrete block and the geometric ballast plate (GBP) specified by European Standard (EN) 16730. How these different support conditions affect the performance of an UBM has not been fully investigated. To better quantify the effects of varying support conditions on UBM bedding modulus, testing was performed in the Research and Innovation Laboratory (RAIL) in University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC). It was found that for a specific type of UBM, the tested bedding modulus values were similar when supported by the steel plate or concrete block, while the value was considerably lower when the mat was supported by the GBP. Finite element simulations were performed to further study the stress distributions under these various support conditions. The results from this study can help practitioners better represent the application environment during the UBM bedding modulus tests by suggesting the appropriate support condition.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In