0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Characterizing Surface Quality Through 3D Parameters: Why 2D Average Roughness Alone Is No Good

[+] Author Affiliations
Suhash Ghosh, Chittaranjan Sahay

University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT

Paper No. IMECE2017-72229, pp. V005T06A013; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2017-72229
From:
  • ASME 2017 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 5: Education and Globalization
  • Tampa, Florida, USA, November 3–9, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5840-0
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

Typically, the design of machine parts is based on the dimensional and form tolerances and fragmentally on the surface roughness parameters (predominantly roughness average Ra). Despite the range of available 3D surface quality parameters, and the modern equipment to accurately measure them, design and quality professionals continue to specify surface finish based solely on the value of Ra. There are many reasons that contribute to this tendency: average roughness remains so easy to calculate, it is well understood, and vast amount of published literature explains it, and historical part data is based upon it. The same outlook trails in undergraduate education and their textbooks. It has been seen that Ra, typically, proves too general to describe surface’s true functional nature. Additionally, the push for complex geometry, coupled with tight tolerances, has reinforced the need to maintain increased process control along with improved surface finish. In turn, the surface finish over the entire area, not just the 2D parameters, tends to dictate the performance and reliability of the component. This article explores how these multitudes of 2D and 3D surface quality parameters are to be understood in the design and development of high performance surfaces, and the strong need for them to be incorporated into undergraduate engineering curriculum, and be taught as an improved toolkit to the aspiring engineers, process engineers and quality control professionals.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In