0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Evaluating and Modeling Force Sensing Resistors for Low Force Applications

[+] Author Affiliations
Mohammad Y. Saadeh, Timothy D. Carambat, Alejandro M. Arrieta

Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, LA

Paper No. SMASIS2017-3703, pp. V002T03A001; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/SMASIS2017-3703
From:
  • ASME 2017 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems
  • Volume 2: Modeling, Simulation and Control of Adaptive Systems; Integrated System Design and Implementation; Structural Health Monitoring
  • Snowbird, Utah, USA, September 18–20, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: Aerospace Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5826-4
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

There has been an increasing demand for force measurement in applications that are portable, wearable, have limited space, low power, or low cost requirements. Such applications cannot support the power and computing requirements of the load cells. Force sensing resistor (FSR) is a passive component that is composed of polymer thick films that change resistance between its terminals due to force applied at its surface. An FSR can provide a suitable alternative to the bulky load cell. However, it inherently exhibits many nonlinear behaviors. This paper evaluates five different FSR sensors (IEE FSR 151 NS, Interlink FSR 402, Sensitronics ShuntMode FSR. FlexiForce A201 FSR, and Sensitorincs ThruMode FSR). The FSRs were evaluated for sensitivity, minimum measurable force, repeatability, creep, and hysteresis. In addition, system identification techniques were used to model each FSR behavior so they can be used as calibrated standalone force sensors. Results show that the Sensitronics ThruMode FSR had the best repeatability and the least hysteresis, while the FlexiForce A201 had the lowest creep, and the Interlinks 402 FSR had the lowest threshold force.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Modeling , Resistors

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In