0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Prediction of Ductile Material Failure by Using Innovative Damage Mechanics Concepts

[+] Author Affiliations
Simon Schaffrath, Markus Feldmann, Victoria Brinnel, Sebastian Münstermann, Denis Novokshanov

RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

Paper No. PVP2017-66096, pp. V06AT06A038; 10 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2017-66096
From:
  • ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication
  • Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, July 16–20, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5799-1
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

Material failure and plastic instability are currently in ASME and EN pressure vessel and piping standards prevented by applying experience-based safety factors. Due to the few existing experimental test results and the inaccuracy of the incorporated design equations, these safety factors are quite high. In particular, modern high strength steels are penalized because of the small yield-to-tensile ratio. Apart from monotonic loading conditions, an economical design of pressurized components to prevent material failure due to ultra-low-cycle fatigue (ULCF) is a big topic.

Experimental tests are in general very expensive and not suitable for the common design. Therefore, a numerical based prediction of the actual burst pressure and the resistance against strong cyclic loading conditions would be favourable. During the last decades innovative damage mechanics concepts have been developed and successfully validated in the scope of structural and plant engineering. Depending on the size of the component and the applied loading condition, several different damage mechanics models are available.

During the studies presented in this paper, a phenomenological damage mechanics model proposed by Bai and Wierzbicki has been utilized. It has been developed to describe the material failure in the upper shelf of the toughness temperature transition curve in case of monotonic loading conditions. Considering an extension based on the effective strain concept proposed by Ohata and Toyoda, the combined model is also able to predict failure in the range of ULCF.

The presented work aims at validating the accurate numerical prediction of failure by using this damage mechanics model. Validation is performed by comparing numerical and experimental results of a burst test of a pressure vessel and cyclic deformation tests of almost constant pressurized bended pipes. The pressure vessel made of HSLA steel P690Q had a length of 3.0 m, a diameter of 1.2 m and a wall thickness of 50 mm. Tests on bended pipes can be separated in two series. A first series made of steel X60 with a diameter of 16 “ and a wall thickness of 9.5 mm as well as a second series made of steel X65 with a diameter of 8.625 “ and a wall thickness of 5.6 mm.

The comparison of experimental and numerical results shows an acutely satisfying prediction of failure. Both, time point and location of failure coincide well. Mesh size dependency must be considered but the approach seems to be promising for further applications.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In