0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Simplified Assessment of Studs Allowing for Low Constraint Conditions

[+] Author Affiliations
P. James, C. Madew

Amec Foster Wheeler, Warrington, UK

M. Jackson

Rolls Royce, Derby, UK

Paper No. PVP2017-65353, pp. V06AT06A029; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2017-65353
From:
  • ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication
  • Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, July 16–20, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5799-1
  • Crown Copyright © 2017

abstract

Defect tolerance assessments are carried out to support the demonstration of structural integrity for high integrity components such as nuclear reactor pressure vessels. These assessments often consider surface-breaking defects and assess Stress Intensity Factors (SIFs) at both the surface and deepest points. This can be problematic when there is a high stress at the surface, for example due to the stress concentration at the root of a screw thread. In the past this has led to the development of complex and costly 3D finite element analyses to calculate more accurate SIFs, and still resulting in small apparent limiting defect sizes based on initiation at the surface point.

Analysis has been carried out along with supporting materials testing, to demonstrate that the increased SIF at the surface point is offset by a reduction in crack-tip constraint, such that the material exhibits a higher apparent fracture toughness. This enables a more simplistic assessment which reduces the effective SIF at the surface such that only the SIF at the deepest point needs to be considered for many defects. This then leads to larger calculated limiting defect sizes. This in turn leads to a more robust demonstration of structural integrity, as the limiting defect sizes are consistent with the capability of non-destructive examination techniques.

An overview of the supporting materials testing is provided in an accompanying paper. The accompanying paper details how it was not possible to demonstrate the required material response with conventional tests, such as those using shallow-notched bend specimens. Instead it was necessary to develop modified specimens in which semi-elliptical defects were introduced into a geometry which replicated the notch acuity at the root of a screw thread. These tests were used to quantify the stud materials sensitivity to constraint. Conventional three-point bend tests were also seen to confirm these values.

A series of R6 constraint modified assessments have been considered to understand the benefit from including a loss of constraint, particularly when assessing the surface breaking SIF. This has necessitated a series of complex finite element analyses to define the elastic SIF as well as the elastic constraint parameter, T-Stress, T. Further verification analyses have also been performed to determine the equivalent elastic-plastic J and Q parameters. These have been used to provide guidance on how best to assess surface breaking defects within studs. This has shown that the increased perceived toughness at the surface location means that under the majority of conditions, the assessment can simply be based upon the SIF at the depth location using high constraint fracture toughness.

This paper provides an overview of the process undertaken to provide simplified guidance on assessing defects within studs that allows benefit from constraint loss.

Crown Copyright © 2017

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In