0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Difference of Strength Evaluation Approach Between for DBE and for BDBE

[+] Author Affiliations
Naoto Kasahara, Takuya Sato

The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Paper No. PVP2017-65478, pp. V03BT03A005; 7 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2017-65478
From:
  • ASME 2017 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 3B: Design and Analysis
  • Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, July 16–20, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5795-3
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

Preparation for beyond design basis events (BDBE) becomes important as the lessons learned from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident.

The objective of strength evaluation for design basis events (DBE) is a confirmation to prevent structural failure for assumed events.

For BDBE, main objectives are weak point survey, deterministic and probabilistic risk assessment, and planning of countermeasures including potable equipment and accident management.

According to the above objectives, strength evaluation approach have to be different between for DBE and for BDBE.

(1) DBE

Conservative approach to prevent of failure.

Design by analysis concept is basically adopted

Assumption of hypothetical failure modes to prevent actual failure modes

Stress criteria to bond actual strength

Elastic analyses for conservative loading assumption

Design factor to bound uncertainties

(2) BDBE

Best estimation of failure behavior with uncertainties to plan mitigations

Identification of realistic failure modes to identify failure consequences

Criteria by dominant parameters of failure phenomena

Inelastic analyses for realistic loading prediction

Probabilistic evaluation to quantify uncertainties.

Strength evaluation concept has not yet been established for BDBE. It is necessary to discuss from basic philosophy to make sharable concepts.

Adequate criteria is required to meet above concepts. Instead of stress, strain is one of candidate.

New evaluation technics are desired to satisfy above criteria.

This paper indicates the direction of strength evaluation for BDBE with same examples proposals. Its aims is to promote international discussions and to implement new technologies to actual countermeasures against BDBE.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In