0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Class 1 Pressure Vessels

[+] Author Affiliations
Mingya Chen, Weiwei Yu, Feng Lu

Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute, Suzhou, China

Jinhua Shi

Amec Foster Wheeler, Gloucester, UK

Paper No. ICONE25-66910, pp. V005T07A004; 6 pages
doi:10.1115/ICONE25-66910
From:
  • 2017 25th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
  • Volume 5: Advanced and Next Generation Reactors, Fusion Technology; Codes, Standards, Conformity Assessment, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues
  • Shanghai, China, July 2–6, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: Nuclear Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5783-0
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

The rules of design by analysis have been widely accepted for the Class 1 Nuclear Pressure Vessel, and two methods, stress classification method (based on the linear analysis) and the direct route (nonlinear analysis by Finite Element (FE) method), have been developed. In the stress classification method, the stress is classified in primary, secondary and peak stresses, and there are many shortcomings in this method. The stress classification is only easy in simple cases, like cylindrical shell under axisymmetric loads. In some cases the elastic analysis result can be non-conservative in particular when a part of primary stresses is considered secondary, like thermal expansion in some piping systems. When the geometry or the loads are more complex (such as, nozzles of reactor pressure vessels (RPV)), it will be an extremely conservative approach if a large part of stresses is considered as primary. Consequently, the direct route based on FE method is an efficient alternative to the linear analyses, and one of the major advantages is to suppress the discussion on the “stress classification in primary versus secondary” associated with the elastic analysis. This work reviews the existing linear design rules in the different codes, such as ASME Code NB 3200 and RCC-M Code B 3200, firstly. Then a typical case study of a large class 1 vessel nozzle, a RPV nozzle, under pressure and piping loads based on linear (stress classification method) and nonlinear rules (direct route) is presented. The case will consider 2D geometries under axisymetrical loads, and the failure models of plastic collapse, plastic instability and local failure are studied. Lastly, a set of proposals to improve the design rules are given.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In