0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Investigations on Oilwell Cement Strength Response to Ultrasonic Measurements in Presence of Additives

[+] Author Affiliations
Niklas Romanowski

TU Clausthal, Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany

Adonis Ichim, Catalin Teodoriu

University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

Paper No. OMAE2017-62393, pp. V008T11A040; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2017-62393
From:
  • ASME 2017 36th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 8: Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology; Petroleum Technology
  • Trondheim, Norway, June 25–30, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5776-2
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

Well cements are an important aspect of wellbore integrity and recent investigations focus on describing the cement lifetime using, when possible, non-destructive tests like ultrasonic measurements. However, the original API and ASTM testing standards were based on destructive mechanical testing of cements, leading to the decision to investigate the backward and forward compatibility between ultrasonic measurements and mechanical testing, which makes the subject of this work.

Ultrasonic cement measurement became a very popular method to assess the mechanical properties of the cement in a non-destructive manner. Since various measurement systems exist on the market, the development of an accurate reference data base that can be used to calibrate such measurements becomes very important. Two major systems have therefore been compared: the ultrasonic compressive strength, using the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) principle, and the unconfined compressive strength (UCS), using the standard testing frame according to API and ASTM standards. The tests have been performed at different curing times, using both devices, on class G API cements with bentonite and other additives.

This paper presents the results of over two hundred experiments that have displayed a different UPV response as a function of the additive content. These allow us to expand the existing UPV vs. UCS correlations. Moreover, it was observed that after a given curing time, depending on the additive and its concentration, the UPV response is not as sensitive as the results yielded by the UCS method. The outcomes are an important step forward to improve and understand the wellbore integrity.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In