0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Wet Gas Compression: Test Conditions and Similitude

[+] Author Affiliations
Dagfinn Mæland

Statoil ASA, Tysværvåg, Norway

Lars E. Bakken

Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Paper No. GT2017-64374, pp. V009T27A018; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2017-64374
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
  • Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, June 26–30, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5096-1
  • Copyright © 2017 by ASME

abstract

Wet gas compression of gas/condensate/water provides a business opportunity for oil and gas producers. There are several opportunities of particular note: 1) As well tail-end production commences, the installation of sub-sea compressors will provide enhanced oil recovery and, if the subsea compressor is capable of handling liquids, the subsea process complexity can be dramatically reduced, thus decreasing capital investments and possibly operational costs. 2) Topside and Onshore projects can also be dramatically simplified. This is the case for both new installations and modification projects for which wet gas compression is a suitable solution.

However, there are several challenges that need to be addressed before wet gas compression, by means of centrifugal compressors, can be considered as a robust commercial solution for future projects. This relates to the robustness of the mechanical design, effects on electrical systems, and issues related to performance. This paper will focus on challenges related to performance prediction and testing.

For conventional dry gas compressor design, performance prediction is usually undertaken by the compressor manufacturer, utilising in-house know-how in impeller design and selection. This specialised knowledge is potentially unsuitable for predicting wet gas performance in the design phase; hence, a wet gas compressor design may not meet design requirements specified by the customer.

It is typical that agreements on performance testing of centrifugal compressors state that these are to be conducted according to an international standard such as ASME PTC10 or ISO 5389. These standards require that the compressed gas is dry.

However, for wet gas compressors, no such internationally established standards exist for performance evaluation. Several of the requirements stipulated in the standards are challenging to apply to wet conditions and they do not ensure similar conditions. Such parameters including the maximum permissible deviation in the specific volume ratio, Mach number and Reynolds number. It is clear that the path towards a standard for wet gas performance testing will require a substantial amount of effort in order to establish new requirements related to wet gas similarity. Based on wet gas compressor test experience, challenges and requirements related to low pressure inert fluid, compared with full pressure actual fluid tests, are analysed and discussed.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Topics: Compression

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In