0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Experimental Evaluation of Thermal and Mass Transfer Techniques to Measure Adiabatic Effectiveness With Various Coolant to Freestream Property Ratios

[+] Author Affiliations
Connor J. Wiese

Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH

James L. Rutledge, Marc D. Polanka

Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright Patterson AFB, OH

Paper No. GT2017-65019, pp. V05CT19A030; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2017-65019
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
  • Volume 5C: Heat Transfer
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, June 26–30, 2017
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5089-3

abstract

As gas turbine engine temperatures increase, experimentally evaluating the necessary cooling schemes becomes increasingly cost prohibitive at engine conditions. Thus, researchers conduct film cooling experiments near room temperature and attempt to scale the results to engine conditions. Although thermal measurements of film cooling adiabatic effectiveness are common, an increasingly popular method of evaluating adiabatic effectiveness employs pressure sensitive paint and the heat-mass transfer analogy. Mass transfer methods are attractive because an impermeable model can be used as an analog for a perfectly adiabatic wall; however, the mass transfer analogy is imperfect. The suitability of mass transfer methods as a substitute for thermal methods is of interest in the present work.

Much scaling work has been dedicated to the influence of the coolant-to-freestream density ratio, but other fluid properties that differ between experimental and engine conditions have only been considered in more recent work. Most notably in the context of an examination of the ability of mass transfer methods to serve as a proxy for thermal methods are the properties that directly influence thermal transport — thermal conductivity and specific heat. That is, even with an adiabatic wall there is still heat transfer between the freestream flow and the coolant plume and the mass transfer analogy would not be expected to account for the specific heat or thermal conductivity distributions within the flow field. Using various coolant gases (air, carbon dioxide, nitrogen and argon) and comparing with thermal experiments, the efficacy of the pressure sensitive paint method as a direct substitute for thermal measurements was evaluated on a simulated leading edge model with compound coolant injection. The results thus allow examination of how the two methods respond to different property variations. Overall, the pressure sensitive paint technique was found to over predict the adiabatic effectiveness of a particular coolant flow when compared to the results obtained from infrared thermography, but still reveals a great deal of valuable information regarding the coolant flow structure.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In