0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Validation of Axial Crack Stability Assessment Methods in xLPR Version 2.0 Code

[+] Author Affiliations
S. Kalyanam, F. W. Brust, G. Wilkowski, D. J. Shim

Engineering Mechanics Corporation of Columbus, Columbus, OH

D. Rudland

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Rockville, MD

Paper No. PVP2016-63830, pp. V06AT06A028; 15 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2016-63830
From:
  • ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 6A: Materials and Fabrication
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 17–21, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5042-8
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

As part of the xLPR (Extremely Low Probability of Rupture) project, validation efforts were conducted to assess the predictive capability of axial surface crack (Ax-SC) and axial through-wall crack (Ax-TWC) stability modules employed for making the crack stability assessment. For the Ax-SC, the plastic collapse solution/criteria from the Ductile Fracture Handbook (DFH) was selected and employed after making detailed comparisons between the solutions obtained from the DFH and API-579/ASME FFS-1 solution methods. Experiments from past tests conducted for the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and by MPA-Stuttgart were used to validate the performance of the implemented axial SC stability module.

Similarly, for the axial TWC stability assessment, a Limit Load solution, and a numerical analysis procedure for an elastic-plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) based method employing a J-integral fracture mechanics parameter approach using a GE/EPRI type J-estimation equation, and tabulated plastic influence functions based on pipe dimension and Ramberg-Osgood material parameters, were used. Experimental results from past pipe tests conducted for the AEC, others conducted for the PRCI, and by Tokyo Gas involving larger diameter pipes were used to validate the performance of the implemented axial TWC stability module.

In this paper, the selection of stability criteria/solutions, their performance and implications for the xLPR 2.0 code are discussed. The impact of using different flow stresses (function of yield and ultimate stresses), and stress magnification factor (Folias bulging factor) expressions, on the predictions is highlighted. Further, a conservative basis for the assessment of axial crack stability in welds is proposed. In closing, additional empirical corrections that can be incorporated without overly biasing the deterministic solutions/criteria that feed into a probabilistic analysis are highlighted.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In