0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Statistical Approach to Estimating a 95% Confidence Lower Limit for the Design Creep Rupture Time vs. Stress Curve When the Stress Estimate Has an Error Up to 2%

[+] Author Affiliations
Jeffrey T. Fong, James J. Filliben, N. Alan Heckert

National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD

Pedro V. Marcal

MPACT, Corp., Oak Park, CA

Marvin J. Cohn

Intertek AIM, Santa Clara, CA

Paper No. PVP2016-63350, pp. V01BT01A055; 12 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2016-63350
From:
  • ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 1B: Codes and Standards
  • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 17–21, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5036-7
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

Recent experimental results on creep-fracture damage with minimum time to failure (minTTF) varying as the 9th power of stress, and a theoretical consequence that the coefficient of variation (CV) of minTTF is necessarily 9 times that of the CV of the stress, created a new engineering requirement that the finite element analysis of pressure vessel and piping systems in power generation and chemical plants be more accurate with an allowable error of no more than 2% when dealing with a leak-before-break scenario. This new requirement becomes more critical, for example, when one finds a small leakage in the vicinity of a hot steam piping weldment next to an elbow. To illustrate the critical nature of this creep and creep-fatigue interaction problem in engineering design and operation decision-making, we present the analysis of a typical steam piping maintenance problem, where 10 experimental data on the creep rupture time vs. stress (83 to 131 MPa) for an API Grade 91 steel at 571.1 C (1060 F) are fitted with a straight line using the linear least squares (LLSQ) method. The LLSQ fit yields not only a two-parameter model, but also an estimate of the 95% confidence upper and lower limits of the rupture time as basis for a statistical design of creep and creep-fatigue. In addition, we will show that when an error in stress estimate is 2% or more, the 95% confidence lower limit for the rupture time will be reduced from the minimum by as much as 40%.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Creep , Stress , Design , Errors , Rupture

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In