0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Double Block Isolation: What Are the Options?

[+] Author Affiliations
Kyle Whiteis, Frank Dum

T.D. Williamson Inc., Tulsa, OK

Paper No. IPC2016-64154, pp. V003T04A029; 6 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2016-64154
From:
  • 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference
  • Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring and Maintenance; Materials and Joining
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 26–30, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5027-5
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

Conventional pipeline maintenance and modification work requires removal of fluids from inside the pipeline section where work will be performed. In order to complete this task, the pipeline must either be depressurized (blown down) or temporarily isolated.

Depressurization can be costly because the pipeline cannot stay in service during the time of decommissioning, intervention and re-commissioning, and depend significantly on factors like pipeline size, length and pressure. As a result, valuable production is lost and downstream customers may be affected. Also, the significant environmental issues associated with the removal of pipeline inventory further escalate the overall costs and complexities of the maintenance/repair process. Depressurization might not even be an option for repair/maintenance work on long pipeline sections.

An alternative to depressurization of the entire pipeline is isolation of the pipeline section requiring maintenance or repair. This method allows the pipeline to stay in service, production downtime and loss of pipeline product are kept to a minimum, with associated environmental and economic benefits.

A wide range of methodologies, both intrusive (such as hot tapping and plugging) and non-intrusive (inline isolation plugs), can be used to isolate in-service pipeline sections. Both approaches are well accepted in the industry, with the choice of one over the other being largely governed by factors such as location and accessibility of the pipeline, operating pressures, pipeline inventory, and costs.

Some maintenance/ repair operations using isolation methods require a facility shutdown. These cases often require double barriers to safeguard personnel and facility equipment during pipeline maintenance. Although the philosophy, definition, and requirements of double barriers have been described in various international codes and standards, certain misconceptions persist surrounding double barrier terminology and its application to pipeline pressure isolation tools. The objective of this paper is to clarify the concepts of double barrier isolation, and to examine how both intrusive and non-intrusive methods can be used to provide double barrier isolation that meets the accepted requirements. The paper also addresses methods that can be used when standard isolation is not practical.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In