0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Full-Scale Pipe Strain Test Quality and Safety Factor Determination for Strain-Based Engineering Critical Assessment

[+] Author Affiliations
Douglas P. Fairchild, Justin M. Crapps, Wentao Cheng, Huang Tang, Svetlana Shafrova

ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, TX

Paper No. IPC2016-64191, pp. V002T06A003; 12 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2016-64191
From:
  • 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference
  • Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 26–30, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5026-6
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

Generating a tensile strain capacity (TSC) prediction model is a difficult challenge in applied mechanics. Because current models are relatively new and extensive strain-based design (SBD) pipeline service experience does not exist, rigorous model validation using full-scale tests (FSTs) is paramount. The lessons learned from 159 FSTs were presented previously and the data base has grown to 173 tests. This data base is used to assess the accuracy of a relatively new TSC prediction model. The new model simulates a single, surface breaking weld flaw; however, some of the FSTs contained interacting or embedded flaws or unintentional weld defects, while others failed by brittle fracture, and still others experienced welding problems rendering them unsuitable for model validation. Of 173 tests, a smaller number (122, 101, or 89 depending on the goal) is used for comparison to the new model. This paper describes (1) the importance of reliable FSTs, (2) how the 173 tests were judged for suitability in model accuracy assessment, and (3) the use of the FST data to develop a safety factor for strain-based engineering critical assessment (SBECA). The safety factor is generated from a 95% upper confidence limit on the ratio of predicted-to-measured TSC. The safety factor is 1.88. Using the new model and this safety factor, a TSC prediction equation is provided for use in SBECA. The practical meaning of this is that if either TSC or tolerable defect size is calculated using the new model, then the probability of being non-conservative is estimated to be 5%.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Safety , Pipes

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In