0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Development and Implementation of a Risk Based Prioritization Methodology for MAOP Reconfirmation of Gas Transmission Facilities

[+] Author Affiliations
Wytze Sloterdijk, Martin Hommes, Roelof Coster

DNV GL Oil & Gas, Groningen, Netherlands

Troy Rovella

PG&E, San Ramon, CA

Sarah Herbison

Exponent, Menlo Park, CA

Paper No. IPC2016-64499, pp. V001T03A028; 10 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2016-64499
From:
  • 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference
  • Volume 1: Pipelines and Facilities Integrity
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 26–30, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5025-1
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

As part of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (PG&E) on-going commitment to public safety, the company has begun a comprehensive engineering validation of its gas transmission facilities that will ultimately support the reconfirmation of maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) for these assets.

In addition to 6,750 miles of line pipe, PG&E’s gas transmission system contains over 500 station facilities. Since this set of facilities is not only large but diverse, and the validation effort for these facilities is expected to be an extensive, multi-year process, a methodology for the prioritization of the facilities needed to be developed to facilitate planning of the process for the efficient mitigation of risk. As a result, DNV GL was retained to develop and implement a risk-based prioritization methodology to prioritize PG&E’s gas transmission facilities for the engineering validation and MAOP reconfirmation effort. Ultimately, a weighted multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach was selected and implemented to generate the prioritization.

This MCDA approach consisted of the selection of relevant criteria (threats) and the weighting of these criteria according to their relative significance to PG&E’s facilities. Relevant criteria selected for inclusion in the analysis include factors that are important in order to assess both the short- and long-term integrity of the facility as a whole as well as the integrity of features for which design records cannot be located. The criteria selected encompass stable threats, time-dependent threats, as well as environmental impact. Enormous amounts of data related to design, operations, maintenance history and meteorological and seismic activity in addition to other environmental data were evaluated with this newly developed methodology to assess the relative risks of the facilities. Pilot field visits were performed to validate the selection of the various criteria and to confirm the outcome of the analysis.

The novelty of this approach lies in the prioritization of facilities in a coherent risk-based manner. The described approach can be used by operators of oil and gas facilities, either upstream, midstream or downstream.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Risk

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In