0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Corrosion Growth and Remnant Life Assessment: How to Pick the Right Approach for Your Pipeline

[+] Author Affiliations
Michael Smith, Cheryl Argent, Andrew Wilde

ROSEN Group, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Paper No. IPC2016-64424, pp. V001T03A020; 14 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2016-64424
From:
  • 2016 11th International Pipeline Conference
  • Volume 1: Pipelines and Facilities Integrity
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, September 26–30, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5025-1
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

Accurate modelling of future corrosion growth is critical to long term pipeline integrity. A lot has been published within the industry regarding how to accurately determine corrosion growth rates (CGRs) from repeat in-line inspection data but there is limited guidance to support pipeline operators in deciding how to apply CGRs in order to support the development of repair plans and investigate pipeline remnant life. The consequences of significantly under- or overestimating CGRs are high and getting the balance right between the two is not straightforward.

Future integrity decisions can be made using maximum, upper bound, or average corrosion rates, and these rates may be calculated for and applied to individual features, pipe joints, or segments. All of the commonly used methods have advantages and disadvantages.

In this paper 10 CGR application methods have been applied to 3 onshore pipelines in which 3 inspections were conducted. The methods were compared against each other by reviewing the corrosion growth predictions from the 1st and 2nd inspections with the actual results of the 3rd inspection.

The aims of the study were:

i. to identify the methods that limit underestimation of corrosion growth but also do not severely overestimate corrosion growth, and

ii. to identify which methods are most appropriate for the different future integrity decisions, e.g. repair & re-inspection planning and remnant life estimation.

A scoring methodology was developed in order to compare and rank the CGR application methods. The methodology was based on an underestimation score (to identify which methods minimize underestimation) and an overestimation score (to identify which methods limit unnecessary repair work). The scoring method allowed for weightings to be applied to the under- and overestimation scores to take account of how the priorities vary when making different future integrity decisions.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Topics: Corrosion , Pipelines

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In