0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

The Application of Smart, Connected Power Plant Assets for Enhanced Condition Monitoring and Improving Equipment Reliability

[+] Author Affiliations
Michael Reid, Bernie Cook

Duke Energy, Charlotte, NC

Paper No. POWER2016-59189, pp. V001T05A006; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/POWER2016-59189
From:
  • ASME 2016 Power Conference collocated with the ASME 2016 10th International Conference on Energy Sustainability and the ASME 2016 14th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
  • ASME 2016 Power Conference
  • Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, June 26–30, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: Power Division, Advanced Energy Systems Division, Solar Energy Division, Nuclear Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5021-3
  • Copyright © 2016 by ASME

abstract

The U.S. electric utility industry continues to undergo dramatic change due to a number of key trends and also prolonged uncertainty. These trends include:

• Increasing environmental regulations uncertainty

• Natural gas supply uncertainty and price

• Economic / decoupling of electricity demand growth from GDP

• Aging coal and nuclear generation fleet / coal retirements

• Aging workforce

• Increasing distributed energy resources

• Increasing customer expectations

The transformation ultimately demands significant increases in power plant generation operating capabilities (e.g. flexibility, operating envelop, ramp rates, turn-down etc.) and higher levels of equipment reliability, while reducing O&M and capital budgets. Achieving higher levels of equipment reliability and flexibility, with such tightening budget and resource constraints, requires a very disciplined approach to maintenance and an optimized mix of the following maintenance practices:

• Reactive (run-to-failure)

• Preventive (time-based)

• Predictive (condition-based)

• Proactive (combination of 1, 2 and 3 + root cause failure analysis)

Many U.S. electric utilities with fossil generation have adopted and implemented elements of an equipment reliability process consistent with Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) AP-913. The Electric Power Research Institute has created a guideline modeled from the learnings of AP-913, that consists of six key sub-processes [1]:

1. Scoping and identification of critical components (identifying system and component criticality)

2. Continuing equipment reliability improvement (establishing and continuously improving system and component maintenance bases)

3. Preventive Maintenance (PM) implementation (implementing the PM program effectively)

4. Performance monitoring (monitoring system and component performance)

5. Corrective action

6. Life cycle management (long-term asset management)

A significant proportion of Duke Energy’s coal fleet is of an age where individual components have reached their design intent end-of-life thereby creating an increased need for performance monitoring. Until recent times this was largely performed by maintenance technicians with handheld devices. This approach does not allow regular data collection for trending and optimization of maintenance practices across the fleet.

Significant and recent advances in sensor technology, microprocessors, data acquisition, data storage, communication technology, and software have enabled the transformation of critical power plant assets such as steam turbines, combustion turbines, generators, transformers, and large balance-of-plant equipment into smart, connected power plant assets. These enhanced assets, in conjunction with visualization software, provide a comprehensive conditioning monitoring solution that continuously acquires sensory data and performs real time analysis to provide information and insight. This advanced condition monitoring capability has been successfully applied to obtain earlier detection of equipment issues and failures and is key to improving overall equipment reliability.

This paper describes an approach by Duke Energy to create and apply smart, connected power plant assets to greatly enhance its fossil generation continuous condition monitoring capabilities. It will discuss the value that is currently being realized and also look at future possibilities to apply big data and analytics to enhance information, insight, and actionable intelligence.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In