0

Pipeline Maintenance in Geotechnically Unstable Areas: A Case Study FREE

[+] Author Affiliations
Michelle L. Sorensen

AEC Pipelines Ltd., Sherwood Park, AB, Canada

Paper No. IPC2000-142, pp. V001T03A004; 17 pages
doi:10.1115/IPC2000-142
From:
  • 2000 3rd International Pipeline Conference
  • Volume 1: Codes, Standards and Regulations; Design and Constructions; Environmental; GIS/Database Development; Innovative Projects and Emerging Issues
  • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, October 1–5, 2000
  • Conference Sponsors: Pipeline Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4024-5
  • Copyright © 2000 by ASME

abstract

The 22″ Alberta Oilsands Pipeline transports synthetic crude oil from Syncrude Canada Limited in Fort McMurray to Edmonton, Alberta. The pipeline crosses the House River approximately 100 kilometers south of Fort McMurray.

The slope has been monitored since 1991 by three slope indicators. A finite element stress analysis indicated that total ground movement since installation in 1977 could correspond to pipeline compressive strains in excess of 0.32%, a level of risk unacceptable to the pipeline owner.

A probability-based model was developed to determine cost and benefit of risk mitigation options. Parameters such as soil movement and pipe strain were input as probability distributions. The mitigation options included: reduce slope instability; reduce pipe stress; reduce pipe-to-soil interaction; implement long term monitoring; determine current pipe strain level (to decrease data uncertainty); do nothing.

A Monte Carlo simulation was used to establish probability of failure and probable cost distributions for each option. The results were presented as a combined cost of failure and mitigation over 10 years.

The analysis indicated that the optimum solution was to remove the existing soil traction loading on the pipe and mitigate long-term slope movement. The decision was made to relieve the pipe strain by excavating. Current pipe strain was measured in situ using residual strain measurement. Long term strain gauges were installed. Slope mitigation was deferred until the strain gauges indicate total pipeline strain levels approaching 0.32%.

Copyright © 2000 by ASME
This article is only available in the PDF format.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In