0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Two Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Compressor Blades

[+] Author Affiliations
Robin Schmidt, Matthias Voigt, Konrad Vogeler

Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Marcus Meyer

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany

Paper No. GT2016-57378, pp. V07BT29A003; 12 pages
doi:10.1115/GT2016-57378
From:
  • ASME Turbo Expo 2016: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
  • Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics
  • Seoul, South Korea, June 13–17, 2016
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4984-2
  • Copyright © 2016 by Rolls-Royce plc

abstract

This paper will compare two approaches of sensitivity analysis, namely (i) the adjoint method which is used to obtain an initial estimate of the geometric sensitivity of the gas-washed surfaces to aerodynamic quantities of interest and (ii) a Monte Carlo-type simulation with an efficient sampling strategy. For both approaches the geometry is parameterized using a modified NACA parameterization. First the sensitivity of those parameters is calculated using the linear (first order) adjoint model. Since the effort of the adjoint CFD solution is comparable to that of the initial flow CFD solution and the sensitivity calculation is simply a postprocessing step, this approach yields fast results. However, it relies on a linear model which may not be adequate to describe the relationship between relevant aerodynamic quantities and actual geometric shape variations for the derived amplitudes of shape variations.

In order to better capture nonlinear and interaction effects, secondly a Monte Carlo-type simulation with an efficient sampling strategy is used to carry out the sensitivity analysis. The sensitivities are expressed by means of the Coefficient of Importance, which is calculated based on modified polynomial regression and therefore able to describe relationships of higher order.

The methods are applied to a typical high pressure compressor stage. The impact of a variable rotor geometry is calculated by 3D CFD simulations using a steady RANS model. The geometric variability of the rotor is based on the analysis of a set of 400 blades which have been measured using high-precision 3D optical measurement techniques.

Copyright © 2016 by Rolls-Royce plc

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In