Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Design of a Screw Heat Exchanger as the Liquid-Suction Heat Exchanger in a Vapor Compression Refrigeration System

[+] Author Affiliations
Francis J. Antonio

Technological Institute of the Philippines, Cubao, Quezon City, Philippines

Menandro S. Berana, Louis Angelo M. Danao

University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines

Paper No. IMECE2015-52419, pp. V08BT10A013; 10 pages
  • ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 8B: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering
  • Houston, Texas, USA, November 13–19, 2015
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5750-2
  • Copyright © 2015 by ASME


The aim of this study is to optimize the design of a screw heat exchanger (SHX) in terms of varying coil aspect ratio (CAR) as a liquid-suction heat exchanger (LSHE) in a vapor compression refrigeration system through Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. The novelty of this study is that it focuses on the fluid-to-fluid heat transfer of SHX to measure its heat transfer effectiveness as compared to many research studies that focus only on helical duct heat exchanger under constant wall temperature and constant heat flux. Optimization of the SHX was done through conjugate heat transfer in a CFD model. High confidence on the computational package was determined as the results of the package on heat transfer between water flows through a shell-and-coil heat exchanger match well with available experimental data of the same setup in related literature.

The performance of SHX with square coil section (SHXSCS) was compared to that of the SHX with circular coil section (SHXCCS). The optimum SHXSCS was then compared to a commercially available LSHE in the form of tube-in-tube heat exchanger (TTHE) which is the most commonly used LSHE in vapor compression refrigeration systems.

The SHXSCS has nominal degrees of superheat of 22.17 °C and nominal degrees of subcool of 17.63 °C. The ratio of the heat of superheating to that of subcooling is seen to increase with increasing CAR and NTU. The RE of SHXSCS is larger by an average of 3.87%, 18.25% and 26.46% compared to those of the SHXCCS, TTHE and the standard vapor compression cycle (VCC), respectively. The COP of the SHXSCS is 2.55%, 10.74% and 5.94% higher than those of the SHXCCS, TTHE and the standard VCC, respectively. The SHXSCS is more capable than SHXCCS in splitting the heat due to the less complicated square cross sections of flows and even less interface materials for heat transfer. Moreover, the SHXSCS is more effective in splitting the heat from subcooling into moderated superheating and largely to the surounding compared to the TTHE mainly due to longer length of interaction of the flows.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME



Interactive Graphics


Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In