0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Multibody Dynamics Solver Performance: Synthetic Versus Realistic Data

[+] Author Affiliations
Ying Lu, Jeff Trinkle

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY

Paper No. DETC2015-46276, pp. V006T10A012; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/DETC2015-46276
From:
  • ASME 2015 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
  • Volume 6: 11th International Conference on Multibody Systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, and Control
  • Boston, Massachusetts, USA, August 2–5, 2015
  • Conference Sponsors: Design Engineering Division, Computers and Information in Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5716-8
  • Copyright © 2015 by ASME

abstract

In the area of robotics simulation, multibody dynamics plays an important role in designing and controlling robots, especially when the robot contacts the environment. Contacts give rise to non-penetration and friction constraints, which are nonsmooth and nonlinear. One way to simulate such systems is through the use of a discrete-time multibody dynamics model in the form of a nonlinear complementarity problem (NCP), for which, finding a solution is known to be NP-hard [1]. In situations where analytical solutions don’t exist, a suite of numerical solutions accessible through a benchmarking framework is useful to fairly evaluate performance of different computer algorithms. However, many algorithm designers don’t have easy access to test data from physical simulators. Under such circumstances, randomized data are used to test the performance of solution algorithms.

In this paper, we present our Benchmark Problems of Multibody Dynamics (BPMD) framework and database, with the data sets from different physics engines, as a benchmarking platform. Then we compare the performance of several solvers on synthetic data and simulation data, to show the superiority of testing solution algorithms with simulation data over testing with synthetic data. We will show that algorithm tested only on synthetic data often fail to solve problem obtained from physics simulations, to demonstrate the benefit of BPMD database.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In