0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Structure Response and Clipping Factor Variabilities Using Probabilistic In-Structure Response Spectra for Functional Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Equipment

[+] Author Affiliations
Cameron B. Samuelson-Sanford, Frederic F. Grant, Philip S. Hashimoto

Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Inc., Newport Beach, CA

Yahya Y. Bayraktarli

BKW Energie AG, Mühleberg, Switzerland

Paper No. PVP2015-45660, pp. V008T08A030; 5 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2015-45660
From:
  • ASME 2015 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 8: Seismic Engineering
  • Boston, Massachusetts, USA, July 19–23, 2015
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5703-8
  • Copyright © 2015 by ASME

abstract

For seismic probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants (NPPs), test-based seismic fragilities for equipment can be developed using the results of dynamic testing. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) TR-103959 [1] formulates test-based equipment fragilities by comparing broadband test response spectra (TRS) to broadband demand spectra. Alternatively, broadband capacity spectra based on earthquake experience can be compared to broadband demand spectra to develop seismic fragilities for equipment that meet the screening criteria of EPRI NP-6041-SL [2].

In-structure demand spectra can exhibit narrow spectral peaks. A clipping factor recommended by EPRI TR-103959 [1] is typically used to clip these peaks to obtain median broadband demand spectra for comparison to broadband TRS. Similarly, a clipping factor recommended by EPRI NP-6041-SL [2] is typically used to obtain conservative deterministic broadband demand spectra for seismic margin assessment.

Four methods are investigated to assess their applicability for estimating clipping factor variability and structure response variability from probabilistic in-structure response spectra (ISRS) with narrow spectral peaks. Probabilistic ISRS at a given structural degree of freedom (DOF) are obtained from thirty simulations by the Latin Hypercube Sampling method. The most rigorous method involves independently clipping each of the thirty probabilistic ISRS. Structure response and clipping factor variabilities are calculated based on statistical analyses of the thirty clipped ISRS.

The other three methods are simplified alternatives to the more rigorous method and require less quantification effort. They involve calculating the median and 84th percentile non-exceedance probability (NEP) ISRS from the thirty unclipped ISRS. The clipping factors and associated clipping factor and structural response variabilities are calculated following the guidance of EPRI TR-103959 [1] and EPRI NP-6041-SL [2].

The results of the four methods are compared, and recommendations for determining the total variability due to structure response and peak clipping are developed. Two approaches that take the lesser combined variability for structure response and clipping from two methods are found to reasonably approximate the more rigorous method.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In