0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Axial Excitation Tool String Modelling

[+] Author Affiliations
Ian Forster

National Oilwell Varco Downhole, Conroe, TX

Paper No. OMAE2015-41393, pp. V010T11A003; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2015-41393
From:
  • ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 10: Petroleum Technology
  • St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, May 31–June 5, 2015
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5658-1
  • Copyright © 2015 by ASME

abstract

Current types of axial excitation tool have been shown to produce beneficial results — in terms of load transfer to the bit, general reductions in string friction and reductions in drill dysfunctions — such as stick slip.

The positioning of such tools to achieve optimum benefit is therefore extremely important — in order to maximize the axial excitation to the areas of the string that require a reduction in friction, and also to minimize the axial excitation to the surface and to sensitive string tools (such as MWD) — where damage may occur.

This paper describes a string model that allows the position of axial excitation tools to be assessed — in terms of the string response — both locally and remotely from the tool.

The model breaks the string down in to springs and masses — with 10 nodes in the upper string; and 5 nodes in the BHA. Additional components can also be added to the string — such as shock tools, jars and accelerators — in terms of mass and stiffness.

The equations of motion are used to connect the nodes in terms of differential equations.

The model is Mathcad based, and as a result, executes very quickly — so allowing comparative studies to be carried out with relative ease.

Data input into the model is also achieved quickly.

The speed with which the model can be used lends itself to fine tuning input data.

The model has been compared with and ANSYS spring mass model, and good agreement has been reached.

Additionally, the model allows more than one axial excitation tool to be added to the string — in order to gauge the benefits of such a configuration.

Damping can also be varied at different locations in the string model.

The results from this model have been used to compare with field test data — derived from a string with instrumentation tool located at various points in the string.

The results show that good agreement can be reached between the model and the field test results, however, careful consideration needs to be taken of the damping assumed in the model.

The model can, never the less, be used for comparative studies — i.e. tool location, number of tools and optimum frequencies.

Further work is recommended in comparing model results with field test results — in order to get a better understanding of the effect of damping.

The damping model could be improved in the model presented here, or alternatively, the lessons learned here could be merged into an existing string model.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: String , Modeling , Excitation

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In