Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Revised Methodology for the Calculation of MODU Watch Circles

[+] Author Affiliations
Conor Quigley, Dara Williams

Wood Group Kenny, Galway, Ireland

Paper No. OMAE2015-41230, pp. V05AT04A008; 9 pages
  • ASME 2015 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 5A: Pipeline and Riser Technology
  • St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada, May 31–June 5, 2015
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5651-2
  • Copyright © 2015 by ASME


As the industry continues to push the boundaries of offshore exploration into deeper water depths and harsher environments there is an increased need to ensure the integrity of both the drilling riser and wellhead in the event of loss of station-keeping in dynamically positioned (DP) rigs. In order to determine vessel limiting operating/alert offsets it is necessary to carry out a vessel drift-off analysis which predicts the vessel drift-off speed and direction in the event of a DP failure.

This analysis is typically performed for a limited combination of environmental conditions (usually collinear wind, wave and current) and will generally assume a vessel position that is directly above the wellhead. Whilst the results of the standard drift-off analysis, and associated drift-off plots, are useful in determining expected drift-off speed and feasibility of the emergency disconnect sequence (EDS), the outputs are of little operational use to the rig personnel in determining allowable operational/alert offsets for day to day operations. As the vessel is rarely located directly above the wellhead and environmental conditions can vary significantly in both direction and magnitude over the drilling campaign a more comprehensive analysis methodology and set of load cases is required in order to develop useful inputs to the well specific operating guidelines (WSOG).

The current standard industry approach is to generate drilling riser operability envelopes independently of drift-off curves and thus recommended operating offsets do not account for drift-off speed, reaction times or EDS times. This can lead to a potential lack of conservatism in WSOG. In order to avoid this lack of conservatism in calculation of operating offsets a coupled steady-state/transient response analysis approach is required to ensure that a DP failure event at limiting operational offset does not lead to damage to the wellhead or riser system.

A new revised methodology for the calculation of allowable operating windows and associated alert offsets is presented in this paper. This new methodology couples both the steady state operating limits of the vessel and the transient system response during a drift-off, due to DP failure, in order to present a comprehensive go/no-go operability chart of allowable offset vs. environment for use as input to the WSOG.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME



Interactive Graphics


Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In