0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Analysis of Rollover Shape and Energy Storage and Return in Cantilever Beam-Type Prosthetic Feet

[+] Author Affiliations
Kathryn M. Olesnavage, Amos G. Winter, V

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

Paper No. DETC2014-35174, pp. V05AT08A018; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/DETC2014-35174
From:
  • ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
  • Volume 5A: 38th Mechanisms and Robotics Conference
  • Buffalo, New York, USA, August 17–20, 2014
  • Conference Sponsors: Design Engineering Division, Computers and Information in Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4636-0
  • Copyright © 2014 by ASME

abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the rollover shape and energy storage and return in a prosthetic foot made from a compliant cantilevered beam. The rollover shape of a prosthetic foot is defined as the path of the center of pressure along the bottom of the foot during stance phase of gait, from heel strike to toe off. This path is rotated into the reference frame of the ankle-knee segment of the leg, which is held fixed. In order to achieve correct limb loading and gait kinematics, it is important that a prosthetic foot both mimic the physiological rollover shape and maximize energy storage and return.

The majority of prosthetic feet available on the market are cantilever beam-type feet that emulate ankle dorsiflexion through beam bending. In this study, we show analytically that a prosthetic foot consisting of a beam with constant or monotonically decreasing cross-section cannot replicate physiological rollover shape; the foot is either too stiff when the ground reaction force (GRF) acts near the ankle, or too compliant when the GRF acts near the toe. A rigid constraint is required to prevent the foot from over-deflecting.

Using finite element analysis (FEA), we investigated how closely a cantilever beam with constrained maximum deflection could mimic physiological rollover shape and energy storage/return during stance phase. A constrained beam with constant cross-section is able to replicate physiological rollover shape with R2 = 0.86. The ratio of the strain energy stored and returned by the beam compared to the ideal energy storage and return is 0.504. This paper determines that there is a trade off between rollover shape and energy storage and return in cantilever beam-type prosthetic feet. The method and results presented in this paper demonstrate a useful tool in early stage prosthetic foot design that can be used to predict the rollover shape and energy storage of any type of prosthetic foot.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In