0

Equations of State for Gas Compressor Design and Testing FREE

[+] Author Affiliations
Sumit K. Kumar

Solar Turbines Incorporated, San Diego, CAUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Rainer Kurz

Solar Turbines Incorporated, San Diego, CA

John P. O’Connell

University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Paper No. 99-GT-012, pp. V002T03A001; 10 pages
doi:10.1115/99-GT-012
From:
  • ASME 1999 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition
  • Volume 2: Coal, Biomass and Alternative Fuels; Combustion and Fuels; Oil and Gas Applications; Cycle Innovations
  • Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, June 7–10, 1999
  • Conference Sponsors: International Gas Turbine Institute
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-7859-0
  • Copyright © 1999 by ASME

abstract

In the design and testing of gas compressors, the correct determination of the thermodynamic properties of the gas. such as enthalpy, entropy and density from pressure, temperature and composition, plays an important role. Due to the wide range of conditions encountered, pressure, specific volume and temperature (p-v-T) equations of state (EOS) and ideal gas heat capacities, along with measured data, are used to determine the isentropic efficiency of a compressor configuration and to model the actual behavior of real gases and compressors.

There are many possible model choices. The final selection should depend on the applicability of the EOS to the gas and the temperature dependence of the heat capacities, as well as the particular process of interest along with the range of pressures and temperatures encountered. This paper compares the thermodynamic properties from five commonly used equations in the gas compressor industry: the Redlich-Kwong (RK), Redlich-Kwong-Soave (RKS), Peog-Robinson (PR), Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling (BWRS), and Lee-Kesler-Plocker (LKP) models. It also compares them with a high accuracy EOS for methane from Wagner and Setzmann in the common range for gas compressors. The validity of a linear temperature dependence for ideal gas heat capacities is also evaluated. The objective was to determine if the models give significant differences in their predicted efficiencies.

It was found that different EOS gave somewhat different enthalpy changes for methane, ethane and nitrogen for real compressions. This appeared to be connected to the different densities given by the models. Interestingly, the isentropic enthalpy changes are quite similar, suggesting that the effect is canceled out when two properties are involved. However, since the efficiency is the ratio of isentropic enthalpy change to actual enthalpy change, the EOS yield different efficiencies. These differences are on the same order as the typical tolerances allowed for prediction and testing of industrial gas compressors (3 to 5%) and comparisons with the highly accurate equation of state for pure methane from Wagner and Setzmann (1991) showed similar differences.

Commonly, the ideal gas heat capacity is assumed linear in temperature from 10 to 150°C (50 to 300°F). Comparison of this form with a quadratic expression from the literature and the highly accurate equation of Wagner and Setzmann for methane, showed insignificant differences among the methods for temperatures up to 600°K (1080°R).

Copyright © 1999 by ASME
This article is only available in the PDF format.

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In