0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Performance Corrections for Steam Turbines With Multi-Pressure Condensers

[+] Author Affiliations
Thomas P. Winterberger

General Electric Power & Water, Schenectady, NY

Ioannis Tzagkarakis

General Electric Power & Water, Glasgow, UK

Paper No. POWER2014-32177, pp. V002T13A004; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/POWER2014-32177
From:
  • ASME 2014 Power Conference
  • Volume 2: Simple and Combined Cycles; Advanced Energy Systems and Renewables (Wind, Solar and Geothermal); Energy Water Nexus; Thermal Hydraulics and CFD; Nuclear Plant Design, Licensing and Construction; Performance Testing and Performance Test Codes; Student Paper Competition
  • Baltimore, Maryland, USA, July 28–31, 2014
  • Conference Sponsors: Power Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4609-4
  • Copyright © 2014 by ASME

abstract

An accurate correction methodology is essential when analyzing test data and trending performance. One of the most critical parameters for steam turbines, which can result in large corrections, is condenser back-pressure or exhaust pressure.

Many large fossil and all nuclear steam turbines are configured with either two or three low pressure condensing exhaust hoods. All exhaust hoods may not operate with the same condenser pressure. Factors affecting condenser pressures between hoods could include the cooling water arrangement, uneven fouling, tube plugging, air removal effectiveness, etc. The biggest impact is likely due to the cooling water arrangement. In a parallel arrangement, the condenser cooling water splits between the shells with each shell receiving an equal amount of flow at the same inlet temperature. In a series arrangement, all cooling water enters and exits the first shell before entering the next shell. In this arrangement the cooling water temperature entering the second shell is higher than the temperature entering the first shell resulting in the condensers operating at different exhaust pressures.

One common practice is to apply a single exhaust pressure correction factor based on the average exhaust pressure of all condenser shells. In cases where the differences in condenser pressure are small, this practice can provide accurate corrected turbine performance. As the difference in condenser pressures increases, the potential for introducing error in the corrected performance results also increases.

This paper will discuss the mechanism of why multi-pressure operation can result in correction errors if not modelled correctly and will also quantify the potential impact of these errors on the corrected performance results. In addition, guidance will be given on how exhaust pressure correction curves should be created and applied to most accurately model the performance of the turbine cycle when multi-pressure operation exists.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In