0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Less-Conservative Approach to Simplified Seismic Analysis for Small Bore Nuclear Piping System

[+] Author Affiliations
Joon Ho Lee, In Yeung Kim

Korea Electric Power Corporation Engineering & Construction Company, Inc., Yongin, Gyeonggi, Korea

Paper No. PVP2014-28183, pp. V008T08A031; 7 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2014-28183
From:
  • ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 8: Seismic Engineering
  • Anaheim, California, USA, July 20–24, 2014
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4607-0
  • Copyright © 2014 by ASME

abstract

Per guidelines for piping system reconciliation such as EPRI NP-6628 (NCIG-14), simplified seismic design methods have been used by nuclear piping designers to deal with small bore piping for many years. These methods are generally based on enveloping the results of rigorous dynamic or conservative static analysis.

Small bore piping is generally more flexible with larger margin in support design comparing to large bore piping. Consequently, Classes 2 & 3 piping less than 2-1/2 inch NPS that is analyzed by a conservative “cookbook method” is excluded from the as-built verification actions in IE Bulletin 79-14. The ASME code’s Subsection NF and B31.1 provide recommended pipe spans by pipe size considering only piping weight; therefore, the seismically qualified piping span must be developed for the peak acceleration of the applicable amplified or floor response spectra.

Simplified seismic analysis method being considered for the Korean nuclear power plants is based on the Load Coefficient Method provided in Appendix N-1225 of ASME Section III. However, since the simplified analysis method involves conservative and enveloping approach in an effort to comply with applicable requirements and results in an excessive number of supports and unrealistically high support loads, the successful implementation largely depends on how the issues related to the excessive conservatism are resolved when determining allowable pipe spans and support design loads of the piping system.

In this paper, simplified engineering equations are presented as a less-conservative approach based on a detailed computer analysis method, which is alternative to the various handbooks and design charts that are based on the conventional hand calculation method.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In