Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Experimental Determination of Pressure Loss Through Porous Membranes

[+] Author Affiliations
Gary A. Anderson, Anil Kommareddy, Zhengrong Gu, Stephen P. Gent

South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD

Joanne Puetz Anderson

Anderson Green Technologies, LLC, Brookings, SD

Paper No. ES2014-6460, pp. V002T04A010; 8 pages
  • ASME 2014 8th International Conference on Energy Sustainability collocated with the ASME 2014 12th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology
  • Volume 2: Economic, Environmental, and Policy Aspects of Alternate Energy; Fuels and Infrastructure, Biofuels and Energy Storage; High Performance Buildings; Solar Buildings, Including Solar Climate Control/Heating/Cooling; Sustainable Cities and Communities, Including Transportation; Thermofluid Analysis of Energy Systems, Including Exergy and Thermoeconomics
  • Boston, Massachusetts, USA, June 30–July 2, 2014
  • Conference Sponsors: Advanced Energy Systems Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4587-5
  • Copyright © 2014 by ASME


Air with carbon dioxide is bubbled through Photobioreactors (PBRs) to add carbon dioxide to the reactor medium, remove oxygen, and mix the medium. Most PBR systems use various types of spargers/diffusers that consist of straight or curved tubes with perforation in them to inject air into the PBR reactor volume. A possible novel approach to introducing air into the PBR reactor volume is to use a plenum under the PBR reactor volume in conjunction with a porous membrane that separates the air in the plenum from the liquid medium in the reactor volume. The resistance offered by the porous membrane and the liquid in the reactor volume to air flow needs to be established so that power requirements to provide the desired air flow through the PBR can be determined. Four types of porous membranes were tested: 1)Sintered High Density Polyethylene HDPE 1.59 mm thick with 15–45 μm pore size, 2) Sintered HDPE 0.79 mm thick with 20μm pore size, 3) Genpore black plastic sheet with 45 μm pore size, and 4) Porex 7896 HDPE with pore size of 35 μm). Specimens were tested in a 76.2 mm inside diameter reactor with a depth of 304.8mm and a 76.2 mm plenum depth. Water was used as the reactor medium and the depth was varied between 0 and 228.6 mm. Results showed that the Porex 7896 membrane had little resistance to air flow when the water depth was 0.0mm (1–22 Pa), 1–200 Pa for the Genpore plastic sheet, 1200–1400Pa for the Porex with 20μm pores, and 1100–2500 Pa for the Porex with the 15–45 μm pore sizes for superficial air velocities between 0.00345 m/s to 0.0242 m/s. Water depth was then increased to 228.6 mm in 25.4 mm increments and tested with the same air flow rates. The addition of water significantly increased the resistance to air flow for all membranes (highest being 4200 Pa). Least square correlations for the membranes using water depth and superficial air velocity indicate that resistance to air flow of the membranes was linear with superficial velocity but parabolic with water depth.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Topics: Pressure , Membranes



Interactive Graphics


Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In