0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

ASME Codes and Small Modular Reactors

[+] Author Affiliations
Dennis Demoss, Stefan J. Janusz, Richard P. Niemer

Sargent & Lundy LLC, Chicago, IL

Paper No. SMR2014-3345, pp. V001T05A004; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/SMR2014-3345
From:
  • ASME 2014 Small Modular Reactors Symposium
  • ASME 2014 Small Modular Reactors Symposium
  • Washington, DC, USA, April 15–17, 2014
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4536-3
  • Copyright © 2014 by ASME

abstract

Authors: Sargent & Lundy, LLC: Dennis Demoss, Stefan Janusz, and Richard Niemer. Focus: Codes and Standards. This paper will review new Small Modular Reactor (SMR) designs and implications on ASME Codes and Standards. SMR technologies which will be discussed include B&W mPower (TVA Clinch River site), Westinghouse SMR (Ameren Callaway site), NuScale/Fluor SMR (Pacific NW lab site), Holtec SMR (Savannah River site), and Non-U.S. Designs such as the Russian SMRs.

U.S. SMR reactor designs vary from 45 to approximately 225 MWe. SMRs, as defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency, have an electrical output less than 700 MW [1]; however, U.S. SMRs are typically defined as producing less than 350 MWe. SMR goals include significantly reducing plant capital cost requirements and enabling multi-reactor module construction and addition over time providing greater utility flexibility. A primary SMR advantage includes its installation in smaller grids typical of electrical power systems in developing countries. Unique aspects of the SMR technologies include integral reactor and steam generator vessel, integral pressurizer and internal piping, below-grade containment vessel, helical-coil integral steam generators, integral decay heat removal systems, modular plant construction and arrangement, in-service inspection unique requirements, special materials, and welding. SMR technologies provide unique challenges for conformance with ASME Codes and Standards.

Non-U.S. designs, such as the Russian floating ship-type configuration SMR (KLT-40S) and Russian land-based SMR (VBER-300), will be discussed from the perspective of compatibility with ASME Codes. Discussion will be provided regarding non-U.S. SMR operational safety and inspection requirements based on ASME Codes.

SMR development may require the expansion and clarification of current ASME Code design rules and requirements. For example, Section XI testing requirements and frequencies may require revision due to longer intervals between refueling. New divisions of ASME Codes may be required to address inspection of SMR inaccessible plant components and materials and plant operational differences from previous LWR designs. Additional reactor internal components and equipment may also require additional ASME Code considerations. Finally, higher design temperatures resulting from passive design shutdown considerations may require development and Code acceptance of new materials.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In