0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Influence of Modeling Assumptions on the Simulated EDM Performance

[+] Author Affiliations
Agustín Márquez Escobar, Dirk F. de Lange, Hugo I. Medellín Castillo, Francisco G. Pérez Gutiérrez

Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, SLP, México

Paper No. IMECE2013-65432, pp. V08CT09A079; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2013-65432
From:
  • ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 8C: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering
  • San Diego, California, USA, November 15–21, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5636-9
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is a non-conventional machining process widely used to manufacture hard material components which are not easily machined by conventional machining processes. Several modeling approaches have since long been proposed to characterize the EDM process, based on the electro-thermal phenomena that occur. Several of these early models are analytical models that have the major advantage of providing predictions of process performance based on analytical solutions. Unfortunately, their derivation often demands a number of assumptions and simplifications, which can limit the scope and precision of the predictions obtained. Two of the most known analytical models are based on different heat sources: a point heat source [1], and a uniform disk heat source [2].

In this paper, these two analytical EDM models are analyzed and compared with more elaborated numerical models in which specific modeling assumptions are lifted; the objective is to quantify the influence of each of these assumptions on the final result. Numerical simulations are based on the finite element method, which enables to study the influence of different temporal pulse shapes, the spatial intensity distribution, the temperature dependency of the thermal coefficients, and in particular the influence of the way latent heat is taken into account. The results are analyzed in terms of the predicted material removal rate (MRR), depth and radius of the crater. A comparison is presented between the two theoretical results [1], [2], and those obtained by the more elaborated numerical models. At the same time, a comparison is also made with some experimental data from literature.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In