0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Errors and Uncertainties: What Hath the GUM Wrought?

[+] Author Affiliations
A. F. Emery

University of Washington, Seattle, WA

T. Vosk

Cowan, Kirk, Gaston, Kirkland, WA

Paper No. IMECE2013-64825, pp. V08CT09A060; 7 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2013-64825
From:
  • ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 8C: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering
  • San Diego, California, USA, November 15–21, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5636-9
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

Traditional error analysis to estimate the uncertainties in experimental measurements and predictions has given way during the last two decades to uncertainty analysis. The current methodology is described in the GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) issued by ISO. The reasoning behind the change was the recognition that one could never know the true value of a measurement and thus the error could not be determined.

As promulgated, the uncertainties are represented in statistical terms based upon sampling (classical statistics) and upon subjective reasoning (Bayesian). The approach combines these uncertainties in the usual error analysis approach of summing the variances (now labeled the ‘Law of Propagation of Uncertainties’) and then using the student-t distribution to attach some meaning to the result.

The correct procedure is to apply the Bayesian approach throughout, but many investigators have heard only that Bayesian inference is computationally expensive and question the idea of subjective probability and resort to using the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties.

This short note treats the common problem of the uncertainty of a measurement using a calibrated device. It compares the two methods, reminding the reader of what the GUM calls for and assumes, and showing that with our current computing power there is no good reason to avoid Bayesian inference to provide more exact and informative understandings of measurement uncertainties.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Errors

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In