0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

The Drift Flux Model After Fifty Years: A Personal, Problem Solving Survey

[+] Author Affiliations
Peter Toma

P. R. Toma Consulting Ltd., Edmonton, AB, Canada

Paper No. IMECE2013-63084, pp. V08CT09A025; 6 pages
doi:10.1115/IMECE2013-63084
From:
  • ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
  • Volume 8C: Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering
  • San Diego, California, USA, November 15–21, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: ASME
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5636-9
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

Offspring of the nuclear reactor industry and gas-oil production, multiphase fluids handling technology appears to have matured into an entirely new field of inquiry, most notably following broad acceptance of the drift flux and flow pattern concepts and their widespread integration into engineering calculations.

The drift flux model (DFM), first suggested by Nicklin in 1962 and, soon after, adapted and developed by Professor Zuber’s research group at General Electric, enables calculation of “locally averaged” phase velocity. Further progress made in selection of the flow patterns, calculated for each section of the pipe, provided the key to properly assessing the terminal velocity of the discrete phase and the local phase distributions.

The flow pattern concept was first introduced by Canadian Charles Govier to describe oil-water laboratory experiments, then by Hewitt-Roberts and Baker in 1954. A decade later, the team of Dukler-Taitel-Barnea developed the qualitative flow pattern concept into a quantitative roadmap procedure leading to rational calculations of the local (cross-section averaged) gas-liquid flow geometry, or flow pattern. The homogeneous gas-liquid flow, presuming the equality of gas and liquid velocities, a simplification broadly accepted during the early days of two-phase flow engineering, came to be regarded, due to Hinze’s work (Shell, 1955), as an identifiable region in the local flow map, reflecting turbulent and high-shear breakup of the discrete phase.

To illustrate the usefulness, validity, and importance of the DFM, and mechanistic modeling using the DFM, as well as the salient work of Prof. Zuber on boiling instability this paper discuses reduction of potential explosive droplet boiling risk during multiphase pumping of high–gas-oil ratio mixtures.

To assess critical operating conditions of the multiphase pumps, the Ishi-Zuber criteria developed during 1970 for assessing potential boiling instabilities were adapted to multiphase pumping/compression equipment and the results compared to field instability data.

The elucidation of this problem relies heavily on the DFM and on salient research performed during 70s by Prof. Zuber’s team.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In