0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Shielding Calculation Research Based on Point-Kernel Integral Method

[+] Author Affiliations
Yuhao Yin, Sizhong Ding, Yichao Huang

Suzhou Nuclear Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Suzhou, Jiangsu, China

Paper No. ICONE21-16846, pp. V001T04A033; 6 pages
doi:10.1115/ICONE21-16846
From:
  • 2013 21st International Conference on Nuclear Engineering
  • Volume 1: Plant Operations, Maintenance, Engineering, Modifications, Life Cycle and Balance of Plant; Nuclear Fuel and Materials; Radiation Protection and Nuclear Technology Applications
  • Chengdu, China, July 29–August 2, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: Nuclear Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5578-2
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

Point-kernel integral method, which has been verified by authorities, is widely used in radiation shielding calculations. In this article, we introduced point-kernel integral method in detail. Calculations have been performed for the radiation shielding design of TEG (gaseous waste processing system) system of one Chinese CRP1000 reactor, using the point-kernel integral codes QAD-CGA and Microshield 9. Dose results calculated by the two representative codes are compared from several aspects. We also focus our discussion on the impact of buildup factors that are fitted by different kinds of methods, which are the most important parameters in point-kernel integral method.

From the discussion in this article, we can draw the conclusions that 1)both of the two codes are of accurate and consistent calculation results, shielding calculation results are convinced; Microshield 9 proved to be reasonably reliable compared to results of traditional code QAD-CGA; 2) compared with QAD-CGA, Microshield 9 uses the latest database and simpler input form, but cannot calculate more than one source at one time; 3) buildup factor plays the most important role in point-kernel integral method; the two codes adopt different kinds of buildup factor fitting method; for the difference of dose calculation results using buildup factor or not, QAD-CGA is a little higher than Microshield 9 because of the different buildup factor calculation principles; 4) besides, the buildup factor reference material is advised to use either the last or the most dominant shielding.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In