0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Comparison of Mechanical Variable Identifiers of Brain Injury

[+] Author Affiliations
Siddiq M. Qidwai, Alan C. Leung, Amit Bagchi

US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC

Nithyanand Kota

Science Applications International Corporation, Arlington, VA

Paper No. SBC2013-14035, pp. V01AT10A001; 2 pages
doi:10.1115/SBC2013-14035
From:
  • ASME 2013 Summer Bioengineering Conference
  • Volume 1A: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms; Active and Reactive Soft Matter; Atherosclerosis; BioFluid Mechanics; Education; Biotransport Phenomena; Bone, Joint and Spine Mechanics; Brain Injury; Cardiac Mechanics; Cardiovascular Devices, Fluids and Imaging; Cartilage and Disc Mechanics; Cell and Tissue Engineering; Cerebral Aneurysms; Computational Biofluid Dynamics; Device Design, Human Dynamics, and Rehabilitation; Drug Delivery and Disease Treatment; Engineered Cellular Environments
  • Sunriver, Oregon, USA, June 26–29, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: Bioengineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5560-7
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

Multiple mechanical variables have been used to describe the occurrence of brain injury in impact modeling of the human head [1, 2]. The validity of these variables for this purpose is usually established separately through the following process. First, a loading test is performed on an animal. Location, type and spatial extent of injury on the brain are measured upon or after loading. Subsequently, computational simulation is performed based on a particular constitutive model of the brain. Mechanical variables such as pressure or effective stress are plotted for the region of interest. The magnitude of the mechanical variable that results in a contour of the same size as the observed extent of experimental injury is declared as the critical value for that type of injury. The choice of mechanical variable itself could be based on conventional wisdom, precedence, or experience of the researcher. Another, much simpler variable-injury correlation process, which does not rely upon simulations, uses the ex vivo failure response of brain tissue as the criterion. For example, the uniaxial failure strain of the tissue may be taken as the critical value for injury.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In