0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Comparison Between the Separated Flow Structures Near the Wake of a Bare and a Foam-Covered Circular Cylinder

[+] Author Affiliations
Iman Ashtiani Abdi, Morteza Khashehchi, Kamel Hooman

University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Paper No. FEDSM2013-16507, pp. V01CT29A006; 9 pages
doi:10.1115/FEDSM2013-16507
From:
  • ASME 2013 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting
  • Volume 1C, Symposia: Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flows; Industrial and Environmental Applications of Fluid Mechanics; Issues and Perspectives in Automotive Flows; Liquid-Solids Flows; Multiscale Methods for Multiphase Flow; Noninvasive Measurements in Single and Multiphase Flows; Numerical Methods for Multiphase Flow; Transport Phenomena in Energy Conversion From Clean and Sustainable Resources; Transport Phenomena in Materials Processing and Manufacturing Processes; Transport Phenomena in Mixing; Turbulent Flows: Issues and Perspectives
  • Incline Village, Nevada, USA, July 7–11, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: Fluids Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5556-0
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate and compare the separated flow structures behind bare and metal foam-covered single circular cylinders by means of Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV). The experiments are conducted for a range of Reynolds numbers from 2000 to 8000 based on the outer cylinders diameter and the air velocity upstream of the cylinder.

The two dimensional planar PIV results as well as proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) analysis show the important effects of the inlet velocity and the foam cover on the separated structures.

The results show a considerable increase of the wake size behind a foam-wrapped cylinder compared to that of a bare cylinder. Interestingly, the wake size increases with Re for a foamed cylinder while for the identical bare cylinder the converse is true. Furthermore, the shedding frequency is found to be around 10% higher in the case of the foam-wrapped cylinder where the wake size is approximately doubled for the former case compared to the latter. The swirl strength, however, is found to be strongly Reynolds-dependent at higher Reynolds numbers. With low Re values, the swirl strength remains the same for the two cases considered here while, on average, it is 15% higher with the foamed case. Our results showed that, with the same fluid velocity, the foamed-cylinders considered in this study cannot be modeled as a bare cylinder of the same size but with a rough surface.

In addition, energy of the large scale separated structures spreads between modes and also the small scale structures contribute to the formation of the flow structures in foam cylinder making them a more efficient turbulent generator for the next rows when used in a heat exchanger tube bundle.

On the other hand, higher energy level in such separated structures will translate into increased pressure drop compared to bare cylinders. Finally, the results of this study can be used as an accurate set of boundary conditions to model the flow field past such cylinders.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In