0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

A Significant Advancement in Understanding Self-Sustaining Pulsatile Injector Dynamics: Effects of Numerics, Nozzle Geometry, Gas Feed Rate, and Non-Newtonian Slurry

[+] Author Affiliations
Wayne Strasser

Eastman Chemical Company, Kingsport, TN

Francine Battaglia

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA

Paper No. FEDSM2013-16074, pp. V01CT18A002; 21 pages
doi:10.1115/FEDSM2013-16074
From:
  • ASME 2013 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting
  • Volume 1C, Symposia: Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flows; Industrial and Environmental Applications of Fluid Mechanics; Issues and Perspectives in Automotive Flows; Liquid-Solids Flows; Multiscale Methods for Multiphase Flow; Noninvasive Measurements in Single and Multiphase Flows; Numerical Methods for Multiphase Flow; Transport Phenomena in Energy Conversion From Clean and Sustainable Resources; Transport Phenomena in Materials Processing and Manufacturing Processes; Transport Phenomena in Mixing; Turbulent Flows: Issues and Perspectives
  • Incline Village, Nevada, USA, July 7–11, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: Fluids Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5556-0
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

The performance of a rather large-scale self-exciting coaxial three-stream airblast injector was studied experimentally and computationally by Strasser [1] and the computational method was validated using an air-water test stand (AWTS). Frequency domain analyses revealed distinct changes in spray character and pulsations as a function of air feed rates. Since that work, efforts have progressed in studying the effects of injector geometry, including inner nozzle retraction, stream meeting angle, outer annulus gap, and nozzle diameter. Changes to retraction produce the most profound, but not always monotonic, responses in the energy content and nature of the spray pattern. Later, the use of slurry and a high-density gas (SH) as replacements for air and water is investigated, revealing that the nature of the SH flow is dramatically different from its AW counterpart. As with AW, inner nozzle retraction and stream meeting angle prove to be the most influential geometry variables. Strong geometry, materials, and gas flow rate interactions are found among the metrics considered. Estimated droplet length scales of the SH system are not much different than those of the AW system. Attempts to further stimulate the spray via modulating the inner gas provide marginal influence for both sets of flowing materials. Lastly, swirling feeds and a multitude of modeling issues are addressed.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In