0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Scaling of the Hydroelastic Response of Flexible Lifting Bodies in Transitional and Turbulent Flows

[+] Author Affiliations
Antoine Ducoin

ENSAM-ParisTech, Paris, France

Yin Lu Young

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Paper No. OMAE2013-11121, pp. V005T06A073; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/OMAE2013-11121
From:
  • ASME 2013 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
  • Volume 5: Ocean Engineering
  • Nantes, France, June 9–14, 2013
  • Conference Sponsors: Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5539-3
  • Copyright © 2013 by ASME

abstract

The objective of this research is to derive and validate scaling relationships for flexible lifting bodies in transitional and turbulent flows. The motivation is to help the design and interpretation of reduced-scale experimental studies of flexible hydrofoils, with focus on the influence of viscous effects on the hydroelastic response. The numerical method is based on a previous validated viscous FSI solver presented in [1]. It is based on the coupling between a commercial Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solver, CFX, and a simple two-degrees-of-freedom (2-DOF) system that simulates the free tip section displacement of a cantilevered, rectangular hydrofoil. To validate the scaling relations, sample numerical results are shown for three geometrically similar models: full scale, 1/2 scale and 1/10 scale. On the fluid side, although the effects of gravity and compressibility are assumed to be negligible, three different methods of scaling the velocity are considered: Reynolds scaling, Froude scaling, and Mach scaling. The three scaling methods produce different velocity scales when the fluid properties and gravitational constant are the same between the model and prototype, which will lead to different scaling for the material properties. The results suggest that by applying Mach scaling (which does not mean the flow is compressible, but simply requires the relative inflow velocity and fluid properties to be the same between the model and the prototype) and Re ≥ 2 × 106, the same material as the full scale could be used, which will lead to similar stress distributions, in addition to similar strains, and hence similar hydroelastic response and failure mechanisms. However, if Re ≤ 2 × 106 and Mach scale is used, a viscous correction is required to properly extrapolate the experimental results to full-scale.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Topics: Turbulence

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In