0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Combined Cycle Phased Testing Philosophy: Revisited

[+] Author Affiliations
Jagadish Nanjappa

GE Energy, Schenectady, NY

Mike Gross

GE Energy, Moreland Hills, OH

Paper No. ICONE20-POWER2012-54551, pp. 849-859; 11 pages
doi:10.1115/ICONE20-POWER2012-54551
From:
  • 2012 20th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering and the ASME 2012 Power Conference
  • Volume 4: Codes, Standards, Licensing, and Regulatory Issues; Fuel Cycle, Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning; Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) and Coupled Codes; Instrumentation and Controls; Fuels and Combustion, Materials Handling, Emissions; Advanced Energy Systems and Renewables (Wind, Solar, Geothermal); Performance Testing and Performance Test Codes
  • Anaheim, California, USA, July 30–August 3, 2012
  • Conference Sponsors: Nuclear Engineering Division, Power Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4498-4
  • Copyright © 2012 by ASME

abstract

Phased construction of Combined Cycle power plants provide power producers the flexibility to install and operate their gas turbines while the steam portion of the plant is erected. This installation sequence presents a unique challenge, from a performance test perspective, of how to accurately determine the new and clean performance of the combined cycle plant had the entire facility been constructed and tested all at once. Specifically, at the time the entire combined cycle is ready to test, the gas turbines will have accrued operating time and have some associated degradation.

During the first phase of construction, the gas turbines are installed and commissioned to operate in simple cycle mode. This is followed by the installation and commissioning of the steam cycle in the second phase of construction. Between these two phases, the gas turbines operate commercially in simple cycle mode. The time lag between the first and second phase varies from a few months to a few years. As such, the thermal performance of the combined cycle plant cannot be measured by means of a single test, instead a series of tests need to be conducted at each phase of installation in order to properly account for the new and clean performance of the equipment when determining the combined cycle plant output and heat rate.

The current ASME PTC 46-1996 test code provides a method for conducting phased tests in section 5.5.3. With the evolution of gas turbines and combined cycle plant technologies, a better understanding of gas turbine degradation phenomenon and an increasing need for utilities to be able to monitor the overall plant performance on a more regular basis, it is worthwhile to re-visit the phased testing methodology outlined in the Code. For instance, the degradation accrued by the gas turbine during simple cycle operation impacts its output, heat rate, air flow and exhaust temperature. The Code accounts for all of these impacts, with exception to the impact of the change in exhaust temperature. Additionally, the calculation method outlined in the Code assumes that the firing levels of the gas turbine remain unchanged when switching operation between simple and combined cycle modes. This assumption may or may not hold true in all instances because, with advanced control systems in place, the gas turbine operation would have been optimized for combined cycle operation. Hence, additional testing and analysis may be required to accurately measure the thermal performance of the combined cycle plant. Lastly, the current Code test methodology requires a set of correction curves dedicated solely for the purposes of phased testing. Analytical studies, prompted by recent test experiences, have been completed with the aid of thermodynamic models to identify the extent to which the test accuracy will be improved by accounting for all the key parameters versus the traditional phased testing methodology outlined in PTC 46-1996.

This paper presents the results of these studies; discusses the key parameters that impact the phased testing philosophy; and outlines a simplified phased test calculation methodology to aid in the accurate determination of combined cycle thermal performance while leaving the plant owners with a set of correction curves that can be utilized not only for the phased test but also for any future performance monitoring activities or predictive analysis.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In