0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Performance Assessment of Hexahedral Meshing Methods for Design and Mechanical Analysis of Composite Materials

[+] Author Affiliations
Lev Podshivalov, Anath Fischer, Pinhas Z. Bar-Yoseph

Technion, Haifa, Israel

Paper No. ESDA2012-82247, pp. 21-27; 7 pages
doi:10.1115/ESDA2012-82247
From:
  • ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis
  • Volume 1: Advanced Computational Mechanics; Advanced Simulation-Based Engineering Sciences; Virtual and Augmented Reality; Applied Solid Mechanics and Material Processing; Dynamical Systems and Control
  • Nantes, France, July 2–4, 2012
  • Conference Sponsors: International
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-4484-7
  • Copyright © 2012 by ASME

abstract

Composite materials can be designed and modeled as material volumes with inclusions of several materials. These multiple inclusions are randomly distributed in a unit cube volume according to the material parameters (density, dimensions, orientation etc.). Then, the finite element (FE) analysis method is applied on the resulting structure to estimate the equivalent material properties. Therefore, these models should to be meshed prior to mechanical FE analysis.

Automatic high quality hexahedral meshing is considered a very complex task. Hence, despite extensive research, currently there are no robust methods that can handle grain-based geometry. Meshing a composite material modeled by multiple inclusions presents a number of challenges: (a) the meshing needs to be robust to dimensions, position and orientation of the inclusions; (b) mesh continuity must be achieved on the boundaries between the volume (also known as the matrix) and the inclusions; (c) the mesh needs to approximate the original geometric model with high accuracy; and (d) high quality mesh elements are required for mechanical analysis.

Structured and unstructured meshing methods can be used for handling this task. In this research two meshing methods were developed to generate high quality meshes: (a) structured meshing created by warping the grid according to the model’s geometry, and (b) unstructured meshing created by projecting the nodes onto the boundaries of the inclusions to achieve exact geometric representation.

The performance of these methods was then evaluated and compared on composite materials with ellipsoidal inclusions. Among the performance criteria for these methods are mesh element quality, geometry approximation error, stress concentrations near the boundaries, and computational complexity.

The results indicate that the proposed methods can be used for design and mechanical analysis of composite materials. Moreover, in homogenization applications the structured warped mesh is compatible in terms of performance and element quality to the unstructured mesh.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In