0

Full Content is available to subscribers

Subscribe/Learn More  >

Shakedown and Ratcheting Assessment of a Tubeplate Using the Linear Matching Method

[+] Author Affiliations
H. Reece-Barkell, M. Stevens

Frazer-Nash Consultancy Ltd., Plymouth, UK

D. J. Tipping

EDF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd., Barnwood, Gloucester, UK

J. Sole

Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK

Paper No. PVP2012-78485, pp. 405-412; 8 pages
doi:10.1115/PVP2012-78485
From:
  • ASME 2012 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
  • Volume 1: Codes and Standards
  • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 15–19, 2012
  • Conference Sponsors: Pressure Vessels and Piping Division
  • ISBN: 978-0-7918-5500-3
  • Copyright © 2012 by ASME

abstract

Power plant components may be subject to severe ranges of pressure and temperature when in-service. As a result, significant pressure and thermal stresses may occur which are cyclic in nature. For such components it is necessary to demonstrate an acceptable creep and fatigue life. However, before any such assessment can take place it must first be demonstrated that the cyclic loading would not lead to incremental plasticity, also known as ratcheting, and ultimately plastic collapse. If ratcheting does occurs then the calculation of creep and fatigue lives based upon a steady cyclic behaviour is invalid. It is therefore useful for find out how close structures are to ratcheting.

A power plant tubeplate has been analysed using non-linear finite element methods to assess its susceptibility to ratcheting and the potential for plastic collapse to occur. This is referred to as a shakedown assessment. Finite element analysis is a traditional method for assessing shakedown, however this approach is computationally expensive. An alternative method of assessing shakedown, which is significantly more efficient, although not as well validated, is the Linear Matching Method.

In this work, both finite element analysis and the Linear Matching Method have been used on a real world problem. The objective of this work is to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the LMM when compared to traditional non-linear finite element methods.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In